Corporate Insolvency Personal Guarantor Liability

Corporate Insolvency – Personal Guarantor Liability under IBC

1. Who is a Personal Guarantor?

A personal guarantor is an individual who guarantees the debt of a corporate debtor.

Usually:

Promoters

Directors

Key managerial persons

Defined through Sections 5(22), 60 & Part III of IBC.

2. Legal Framework

Personal guarantor insolvency is governed by:

Part III of IBC

Sections 95–101 (insolvency process)

Section 60(2) – Proceedings against personal guarantor of a corporate debtor lie before same NCLT handling CIRP.

3. Nature of Liability

Under Indian Contract Act, Section 128:

Liability of guarantor is co-extensive with principal debtor.

Meaning:

Creditor can proceed against guarantor even without exhausting remedies against corporate debtor.

4. Impact of Corporate Insolvency on Guarantor

IssueLegal Position
Moratorium under Section 14Does not extend to guarantor
Approval of resolution planDoes not automatically discharge guarantor
Separate insolvency possibleYes, under Part III

5. Process Against Personal Guarantor

Creditor files application under Section 95

Interim moratorium applies

Resolution Professional appointed

Repayment plan considered

Bankruptcy may follow

6. Why IBC Targets Personal Guarantors

Prevents misuse of limited liability

Improves credit discipline

Enhances recovery prospects

7. Landmark Case Laws

1. Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India (SC, 2021)

Upheld validity of provisions applying IBC to personal guarantors; clarified that discharge of corporate debtor does not automatically discharge guarantor.

2. SBI v. V. Ramakrishnan (SC, 2018)

Section 14 moratorium does not protect personal guarantors.

3. Maharashtra State Electricity Board v. Official Liquidator (SC)

Reiterated principle of co-extensive liability of guarantors.

4. Essar Steel v. Satish Kumar Gupta (SC, 2019)

Observed that resolution plan approval binds guarantors but does not absolve their liability unless plan provides.

5. State Bank of India v. Athena Energy Ventures (NCLAT)

Held that insolvency proceedings against corporate debtor and guarantor can run simultaneously.

6. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. v. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir (SC)

Discussed guarantor liability and creditor’s rights.

7. Industrial Investment Bank of India v. Biswanath Jhunjhunwala (SC)

Creditor can proceed against guarantor without first exhausting remedies against borrower.

8. Defences Available to Guarantor

Limited defences:

Fraud in guarantee

Material alteration of contract

Guarantee discharged by law

But resolution of corporate debtor is not a defence.

9. Consequences for Personal Guarantors

Insolvency proceedings before NCLT

Asset attachment

Bankruptcy order

Restriction on business activities

Conclusion

IBC establishes that:

✔ Personal guarantors remain liable despite corporate resolution
✔ Moratorium does not shield them
✔ Creditors can pursue parallel remedies

The law strengthens creditor rights and prevents promoters from escaping liability through corporate insolvency.

LEAVE A COMMENT