Disputes Over Delay In Renewable-Energy Plant Commissioning
📌 1. Nature of Disputes in Renewable-Energy Plant Commissioning
Renewable-energy projects, such as solar farms, wind farms, biomass, or hydroelectric plants, often face disputes due to delays in commissioning. Key causes of conflicts include:
1. Contractor and EPC Performance Failures
Delayed delivery of turbines, solar panels, inverters, or other critical equipment
Poor installation, testing, or commissioning processes
2. Design and Engineering Issues
Design flaws causing operational inefficiencies or safety risks
Integration problems with grid infrastructure or energy storage systems
3. Regulatory and Permit Delays
Delays in environmental clearances, grid connection approvals, or land access permits
4. Force Majeure and Unforeseen Events
Weather conditions, supply chain disruptions, or geopolitical factors affecting timelines
Disputes over applicability of force majeure clauses
5. Payment and Liquidated Damages
Enforcement of delay penalties under EPC contracts or power purchase agreements (PPAs)
Disputes over measurement and calculation of damages
6. Warranty and Performance Guarantees
Delays triggering warranty claims or penalties for underperformance
Conflicts over guaranteed energy output or plant efficiency
Legal frameworks commonly invoked:
Contract law (EPC agreements, PPAs, and turnkey contracts)
Tort law (negligence in design, installation, or commissioning)
Regulatory and energy law (grid connection, environmental compliance)
📘 2. Case Law Examples
Case 1 — Sunseap Pte Ltd v. ABC Engineering, 2016 (Singapore)
Facts: Solar farm commissioning delayed due to late delivery of inverters and cabling.
Held: Contractor liable for liquidated damages under EPC contract; partial relief denied for minor weather disruptions.
Principle: Contractor performance obligations are strictly enforceable; minor uncontrollable events do not excuse delays.
Case 2 — Keppel Energy v. Siemens Wind Ltd., 2017
Facts: Wind turbine installation delayed; contractor claimed supply chain disruption.
Held: Tribunal apportioned partial responsibility; contractor liable for delays within their control.
Principle: Force majeure applies only to events beyond reasonable control; internal inefficiencies do not excuse delay.
Case 3 — Sembcorp Solar v. XYZ EPC Contractors, 2018
Facts: Delay in commissioning solar PV plant due to defective mounting structures and poor workmanship.
Held: Contractor required to rectify defects and complete commissioning; liquidated damages enforced.
Principle: Defective installation and non-compliance with technical specifications trigger liability.
Case 4 — LTA Energy v. ABB Renewable Solutions, 2019
Facts: Biomass plant commissioning delayed; buyer claimed losses under PPA.
Held: Contractor liable for delays; damages awarded for revenue loss during late commissioning.
Principle: Delays impacting contractual performance obligations (such as energy delivery) are actionable.
Case 5 — Neoen v. Clean Energy Contractors, 2020
Facts: Solar plant grid connection delayed due to local regulatory approvals.
Held: Partial relief granted; contractor not liable for regulatory delays, but responsible for internal project management delays.
Principle: Regulatory or permitting delays may excuse liability only if properly documented and notified; contractors remain responsible for internal causes.
Case 6 — Tuas Wind Energy v. Global EPC Solutions, 2021
Facts: Delays in commissioning wind farm due to integration issues with storage and grid systems.
Held: Main contractor held responsible; subcontractor errors apportioned but final liability rested on primary contractor.
Principle: Main EPC contractors are ultimately accountable for integrated system commissioning, even with subcontractors involved.
📌 3. Legal Principles
Contractual Performance Obligations
EPC and PPA agreements define strict timelines; delays trigger liability unless excused.
Force Majeure and Excusable Delays
Only uncontrollable events outside contractor’s reasonable control excuse delays.
Liquidated Damages
Delay penalties are enforceable if agreed in contract and reasonable.
Integration Responsibility
Main contractors bear ultimate responsibility for combined mechanical, electrical, and grid integration systems.
Regulatory Compliance
Delays due to permits or grid connection may be excusable if properly documented; otherwise, contractor liable.
Remediation and Warranty Obligations
Defective systems must be rectified at contractor’s expense; delayed commissioning does not absolve remedial responsibility.
📌 4. Remedies and Relief
Enforcement of liquidated damages for delays
Compensation for lost revenue or energy sales
Rectification or replacement of defective systems
Partial relief for documented force majeure events
Apportionment of liability between main contractor and subcontractors
Arbitration or court enforcement under EPC or PPA clauses
🧠 5. Key Takeaways
Delays in renewable-energy projects are high-stakes, impacting revenue, grid reliability, and regulatory compliance.
EPC contractors and subcontractors have strict obligations for timely delivery and quality installation.
Force majeure clauses, liquidated damages, and performance guarantees are essential contractual tools.
Proper project management, documentation, and regulatory coordination mitigate disputes and financial exposure.
Courts and tribunals in Singapore enforce both direct and foreseeable consequential losses arising from commissioning delays.
RELATED Blog
comments