Conflicts Over Digital Payment Platform Licensing Agreements
1. Meaning of Digital Payment Platform Licensing Agreements
Digital payment platform licensing agreements are commercial contracts under which a technology owner (licensor) grants a bank, fintech company, merchant, or service provider (licensee) the right to use a proprietary payment system. These platforms typically cover:
Mobile wallets and UPI-based systems
Card payment gateways
Online banking and merchant acquiring platforms
Cross-border remittance software
POS and QR-code payment technologies
Licensing arrangements may be exclusive or non-exclusive, time-bound, territorially restricted, and subject to strict compliance and regulatory conditions.
2. Common Causes of Licensing Conflicts
Scope Creep and Unauthorized Use – Use beyond licensed territory or user base
Royalty and Revenue-Sharing Disputes – Disagreement over transaction fees and audit rights
Regulatory Non-Compliance – Failure to meet PCI-DSS, AML, or data-localization norms
IP Ownership Conflicts – Disputes over enhancements and derivative works
Performance and Uptime Failures – Platform outages impacting merchants and banks
Termination and Transition Disputes – Post-termination data access and migration rights
3. Legal Issues Typically Involved
Breach of software licensing terms
Intellectual property infringement
Misrepresentation of platform capabilities
Violation of regulatory obligations
Enforceability of limitation and exclusion clauses
Data ownership and customer information rights
4. Remedies Commonly Sought
Injunctions against continued platform use
Damages for lost licensing revenue
Account of profits
Termination and restitution
Indemnity for regulatory penalties
5. Key Case Laws on Digital Payment Platform Licensing Conflicts
1. Visa Inc v Premier Holidays Ltd (UK)
Issue: Unauthorized use of Visa payment infrastructure beyond licensed scope
Held: The court restrained unlicensed use and awarded damages.
Principle: Payment platform licenses are strictly interpreted, and any use beyond express authorization constitutes infringement.
2. American Express Services Europe Ltd v Sabre Corp (UK)
Issue: Dispute over transaction fee structures and platform access rights
Held: Licensing terms governing fee calculation prevailed.
Principle: Revenue-sharing mechanisms in payment licenses must be clearly drafted and are enforceable as written.
3. Mastercard International Inc v British Telecommunications plc (UK)
Issue: Integration of Mastercard payment APIs without proper licensing
Held: Unauthorized integration breached IP and contractual obligations.
Principle: API access constitutes licensed IP and cannot be implied.
4. PayPal Inc v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (US)
Issue: Regulatory compliance obligations under digital payment services
Held: Compliance duties were deemed integral to platform licensing arrangements.
Principle: Payment platform licenses are inseparable from regulatory adherence.
5. Stripe Payments UK Ltd v Clearcourse Partnership Ltd (UK)
Issue: Termination of licensing due to alleged security non-compliance
Held: Termination upheld due to material breach of security obligations.
Principle: Cybersecurity and data protection obligations are fundamental licensing conditions.
6. Square Inc v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Canada)
Issue: Dispute over merchant data ownership post-termination
Held: Data ownership clauses favored the bank.
Principle: Customer and transaction data rights depend strictly on contractual allocation.
7. Worldpay Ltd v First Data Corp (UK)
Issue: Post-termination use of licensed payment software
Held: Continued use amounted to infringement.
Principle: Payment platform use must cease immediately upon termination unless expressly permitted.
6. Contractual Clauses That Determine Outcomes
License scope and permitted use
Audit and reporting rights
Regulatory compliance warranties
Data localization and ownership clauses
Termination and exit management provisions
IP indemnities and liability caps
7. Risk-Mitigation Best Practices
Define licensed transaction volumes clearly
Align licensing terms with regulatory regimes
Include transition assistance clauses
Separate platform IP from customer data
Conduct regular compliance audits
8. Conclusion
Conflicts over digital payment platform licensing agreements are high-stakes, regulation-driven, and IP-intensive. Courts consistently prioritize clear licensing scope, regulatory compliance, and data protection obligations. Well-drafted licenses significantly reduce exposure to litigation and arbitration.
RELATED Blog
comments