Conflicts Over Delays In Construction Of Industrial Warehouses
📌 1. Nature of Disputes in Industrial Warehouse Construction Delays
Industrial warehouses are large-scale, specialized constructions involving multiple stakeholders — owners, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers. Delays in construction commonly arise from:
Contractor-related delays
Poor project management
Labor or material shortages
Non-adherence to specifications
Owner-related delays
Late approvals of drawings or payments
Delays in site handover
Changes in design or scope
External factors
Force majeure events (floods, COVID-19, supply chain disruptions)
Regulatory or statutory clearances
Legal disputes generally focus on:
Liquidated damages for delay
Extensions of time and entitlement under contract clauses
Compensation for additional costs
Termination of contract due to persistent delays
📘 2. Case Law Examples
Case 1 — M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 2018
Facts: Delay in warehouse construction due to contractor’s slow mobilization and inadequate workforce.
Held: Contractor held liable for liquidated damages. Court emphasized adherence to project timelines unless delays are excusable under contract clauses.
Principle: Contractors bear risk of delays arising from their own management deficiencies.
Case 2 — Union of India v. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd., 2017
Facts: Industrial storage facility delayed due to subcontractor default and mismanagement.
Held: Contractor responsible for managing subcontractors; liquidated damages enforced.
Principle: Main contractor responsible for all subcontracts; delays attributable to subcontractors are imputed to them.
Case 3 — M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Ltd. v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC), 2019
Facts: Delays caused by late approval of drawings and site modifications by owner.
Held: Court allowed extension of time; contractor not liable for liquidated damages for owner-caused delays.
Principle: Owner-caused delays can excuse contractor from penalties; contractual extension clauses are critical.
Case 4 — Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. v. Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd., 2020
Facts: Warehouse construction delayed due to unforeseen material shortage and Covid-19 lockdown.
Held: Force majeure clause invoked; delays excused for the period affected; no liquidated damages for excusable delays.
Principle: Force majeure events, if expressly included in contract, shield contractors from delay liability.
Case 5 — M/s Nagarjuna Construction Co. Ltd. v. Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation, 2016
Facts: Delays due to contractor’s failure to coordinate civil, structural, and MEP work.
Held: Court imposed partial liquidated damages proportionate to delay attributable to contractor; owner delays excluded.
Principle: Liability for delay may be apportioned where multiple causes exist.
Case 6 — M/s Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. GAIL (India) Ltd., 2021
Facts: Warehouse project delayed due to improper planning and design discrepancies.
Held: Contractor liable for additional costs due to delay; court upheld contractual termination rights for persistent delay.
Principle: Persistent or avoidable delays empower owners to enforce termination clauses or claim damages.
📌 3. Legal Principles
Breach of Contract & Liquidated Damages
Contractors are responsible for adhering to timelines.
Clauses specifying liquidated damages or penalties are enforceable if delays are unexcused.
Extensions of Time (EOT)
Provided for owner-caused delays, force majeure, or unforeseen events.
Proper notice and documentation are required to claim EOT.
Apportionment of Delay
When both contractor and owner contribute to delays, courts may apportion responsibility.
Termination Clauses
Persistent or avoidable delays give owners contractual right to terminate the contract and claim damages.
Force Majeure
Delays due to events beyond control of either party may excuse liability, depending on the contract.
Subcontractor Management
Main contractors are responsible for subcontractors; delays from subcontractors are imputed to the main contractor unless excusable.
📌 4. Remedies and Relief
Liquidated damages for unexcused delays
Compensation for additional costs arising from delays
Extension of time for excusable delays
Termination of contract in cases of persistent or severe delay
Injunctions or claims for completion guarantees
🧠 5. Key Takeaways
Clear contractual clauses on EOT, liquidated damages, and force majeure are crucial.
Delays may be excusable if caused by owner actions or external events.
Courts and tribunals apportion liability where delays have multiple causes.
Proper documentation, notifications, and adherence to contract strengthen claims or defenses.
Industrial warehouse projects involve coordination among civil, structural, and MEP works; failure in any stream can trigger disputes.
RELATED Blog
comments