Artificial Intelligence law at Mongolia
1. National AI and Big Data Strategy (2025)
What happened: The Mongolian government launched a national framework to promote AI and Big Data in key sectors like mining, energy, healthcare, and public services.
Legal relevance: The strategy is designed to prepare a legal and regulatory basis for AI deployment. It emphasizes data governance, cybersecurity, and ethical standards.
Impact: This case shows proactive policy-level governance before widespread AI use. It also highlights the government’s attempt to balance innovation with citizen protection.
Challenges: Drafting regulations that cover AI liability, transparency, and privacy; ensuring public institutions comply with emerging ethical standards.
2. AI Chatbots and Automation in E-Mongolia (Public Service)
What happened: E-Mongolia, the national e-government platform, integrated AI-powered chatbots to provide citizen services like license applications, inquiries, and online records.
Legal relevance: Raises questions about data privacy, accountability, and algorithmic fairness.
Impact: Improves efficiency in public service delivery. Citizens get faster responses and reduced bureaucratic delays.
Challenges: Ensuring AI decisions or advice do not violate personal data protections; establishing oversight in the absence of specific AI law.
3. AI in Customs and Border Control
What happened: The Mongolian Customs Department introduced AI-based systems to monitor goods, predict high-risk shipments, and streamline customs procedures.
Legal relevance: AI is being applied in a law enforcement setting, which raises legal questions about surveillance, due process, and data use.
Impact: Reduces corruption, increases operational efficiency, and improves transparency in customs.
Challenges: Balancing security with citizens’ rights; creating accountability for automated decisions.
4. Legal-Tech AI: “Robot Lawyer” in Private Law Firms
What happened: In 2019, a Mongolian law firm launched an AI-based tool for contract automation and basic legal advice.
Legal relevance: Even without AI-specific legislation, the tool operates within existing civil and professional law. Raises questions of liability if AI advice is incorrect.
Impact: Improves access to legal services and reduces workload for lawyers.
Challenges: Professional ethics, consumer protection, and transparency in AI-generated legal advice.
5. AI in Judicial Processes (Academic and Institutional Debate)
What happened: Mongolian legal scholars and judicial institutions are discussing AI for court management, document analysis, and evidence review.
Legal relevance: AI could assist judges but needs regulation to ensure fairness, prevent bias, and preserve judicial integrity.
Impact: Highlights institutional awareness and need for AI governance in sensitive sectors.
Challenges: No existing guidelines on AI use in courts; risk of bias or errors in AI-assisted decisions; balancing efficiency with legal ethics.
Summary
These five cases show policy, public service, law enforcement, private sector, and judicial applications of AI in Mongolia.
Key legal issues across all cases: data privacy, accountability, transparency, algorithmic fairness, and ethics.
Common theme: Mongolia is building AI governance gradually through strategies, pilot projects, and debates rather than formal laws.
RELATED Blog
comments