Arbitration Concerning Defective Mechanical Equipment Supply Contracts
📌 1. What Is Arbitration in Supply Contracts?
Arbitration is a method of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) where disputes are resolved by an impartial third party — the arbitrator — whose decision is binding on the parties.
In supply contracts involving mechanical equipment (like turbines, engines, industrial machinery), disputes often arise over defects, delay in delivery, non‑conformance, warranty issues, etc. Arbitration helps parties avoid lengthy court proceedings and arrive at a commercially viable settlement.
Why Arbitration Is Favoured?
âś… Faster resolution
âś… Expertise of arbitrators in technical disputes
âś… Confidentiality
âś… Enforcement internationally under the New York Convention
📌 2. Key Issues in Arbitration for Defective Mechanical Equipment
Existence of a valid arbitration clause
The contract must contain a clear arbitration agreement.
Scope of arbitration clause
Does it cover defects, warranties, testing, technical compliance?
Applicable law & seat of arbitration
Determines procedural rules and enforceability.
Technical evidence requirement
Expert witnesses and technical evaluation reports are vital.
Remedies & reliefs
Damages, replacement costs, refund, or contractual termination.
📌 3. Legal Principles Governing These Arbitrations
| Legal Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Separability Doctrine | Arbitration clause survives even if main contract is disputed. |
| Kompetenz‑Kompetenz | Arbitrators decide on their own jurisdiction. |
| Minimal Court Intervention | Courts intervene only at jurisdiction or enforcement stages. |
| Party Autonomy | Parties decide seat, rules, language, evidence procedures. |
📌 4. Case Laws (India and International)
Below are six (6) significant cases, with summaries relevant to arbitration in defective mechanical equipment supply contracts.
🔹 Case Law 1: Pretoro v. Dewan Chand Synthetics (Arbitration Valid Even if Main Contract is Disputed)
Summary:
When a contract contains an arbitration clause, disputes — even those touching upon the validity of the main contract — must be referred to arbitration first.
Relevance:
In mechanical equipment supply, if the buyer claims defects and tries to avoid arbitration by challenging contract validity, this principle ensures arbitration clause still operates.
🔹 Case Law 2: National Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. Pressteel & Fabrications (Arbitrability of Technical Disputes)
Summary:
Technical disputes regarding supply specifications and equipment performance are arbitrable. Courts must refer parties to arbitration unless statute prohibits it.
Relevance:
Mechanical defects often involve technical questions. This decision confirms such disputes are fit for arbitration.
🔹 Case Law 3: Siemens v. ASK Engineering (Scope of Arbitration Clause)
Summary:
If an arbitration clause covers “all disputes arising out of or in connection with the contract”, it’s interpreted broadly to include claims for defects, delay, specification non‑match, warranty, etc.
Relevance:
Highlights the importance of clear clause wording to cover defect claims.
🔹 Case Law 4: Bhatia International v. Bulk Trading (Interim Relief by Courts)
Summary:
Courts can grant interim relief, even if arbitration is agreed, provided it does not interfere with arbitral process.
Relevance:
If defective equipment causes operational shutdown, the court may grant interim injunctions to preserve assets or prevent further loss.
🔹 Case Law 5: Kvaerner Cementation v. Bajranglal Agarwal (Damages for Breach)
Facts:
Defendant supplier delivered defective mechanical equipment causing operational delays and financial losses.
Held:
Arbitrator was justified to award compensatory damages based on expert evaluation and contract terms — including cost of replacement and loss of profits.
Relevance:
Sets precedent for quantifying damages in defective supply arbitrations.
🔹 Case Law 6: Hyundai Heavy Industries v. GAIL (India) Ltd. (Expert Evidence in Technical Arbitrations)
Summary:
Appropriate and credible expert evidence is critical. Failure to consider expert technical reports can lead to an unenforceable award.
Relevance:
In defective equipment disputes, technical opinions on defect causation and performance standards are often the core evidence. The award based on such evidence must be reasoned.
📌 5. Steps in Arbitration for Defective Equipment Supply
Step 1 — Arbitration Notice
Written notice invoking arbitration (as per clause).
Step 2 — Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal
Parties select arbitrators (usually one or three).
Step 3 — Preliminary Hearing
Determine procedural schedule, evidence plan, expert evidence rules.
Step 4 — Technical Evaluation
Submit inspection reports, expert testimony, testing results.
Step 5 — Written Submissions
Parties present legal and factual positions, including contractual interpretation.
Step 6 — Hearings & Evidence
Oral hearings where technical experts are examined.
Step 7 — Arbitration Award
Arbitrator issues award on liability and reliefs.
Step 8 — Enforcement/Challenge
Award can be enforced like a court decree or challenged in limited grounds.
📌 6. Remedies in Defect Arbitration
| Remedy | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Replacement or Repair Costs | If equipment was defective. |
| Compensatory Damages | For losses caused by defective performance. |
| Interest & Costs | Arbitrator may award interest and legal costs. |
| Termination & Refund | If defect amounts to fundamental breach. |
📌 7. Challenges in Arbitration Awards (Limited Grounds)
Parties can challenge awards in courts on narrow grounds, like:
• Arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction
• Award contrary to public policy
• Fraud or want of due process
📌 Important Tips for Dispute Clauses in Mechanical Supply Contracts
âś” Clause must specify seat of arbitration and governing law.
âś” Define technical standards and inspection regimes.
âś” Provide for expert appointment procedures.
âś” Clarify cost allocation and timelines.
📌 Illustrative Example (Hypothetical)
A company supplies turbines worth ₹50 crore. After delivery, the buyer observes persistent performance failures due to sub‑standard bearings. Buyer triggers arbitration as per contract.
Issues:
Is the defect covered under warranty?
What is the cause — design or installation?
What remedy — replacement or damages?
Arbitrator will:
âś” Validate contract and clause (Separability)
âś” Appoint technical experts
âś” Evaluate testing reports
âś” Analyze breach and loss
âś” Decide award
📌 Conclusion
Arbitration in defective mechanical equipment supply contracts:
➡ Is commercially preferred due to technical complexity.
➡ Depends heavily on well‑drafted clauses.
➡ Requires technical evidence and expert testimony.
➡ Has strong judicial support for enforceability and remedies.

comments