• 

Transnational Public Policy In Bahraini Arbitration

1. Legal Framework in Bahrain

(a) Bahrain Arbitration Law

• Legislative Decree No. 9 of 2015
• Based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration

(b) New York Convention

• Bahrain is a signatory to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

Relevant Provisions:

• Refusal of enforcement if:
  • Award violates public policy of Bahrain

2. What is Transnational Public Policy?

Definition:

Transnational (or international) public policy refers to:

Fundamental principles of justice, morality, and fairness recognized across legal systems, not limited to domestic law.

Types of Public Policy:

3. Bahraini Approach to Public Policy

Bahrain adopts a restrictive and internationalist approach:

Key Features:

• Public policy interpreted narrowly
• Focus on international public policy, not purely domestic rules
• Courts avoid reviewing merits of arbitral awards

4. Core Elements of Transnational Public Policy

Typical principles recognized include:

• Prohibition of fraud and corruption
• Principles of natural justice
• Due process and fair hearing
• Prohibition of money laundering
• Good faith in contractual dealings

5. Application in Bahrain

Bahraini courts may refuse enforcement if:

• Award involves illegal activity
• Arbitration procedure violated natural justice
• Enforcement would offend basic moral or legal principles

However:

Mere error of law or fact ≠ violation of public policy

6. Key Case Laws (International & Persuasive)

Since Bahraini jurisprudence is limited in published arbitration cases, courts rely heavily on international authorities.

1. Parsons & Whittemore Overseas Co Inc v Societe Generale de L'Industrie du Papier

Principle:

• Public policy defense must be narrowly construed
• Applies only when enforcement violates most basic notions of morality and justice

Relevance:

• Foundational case influencing global arbitration, including Bahrain

2. Renusagar Power Co Ltd v General Electric Co

Principle:

• Defined international public policy as:
  • Fundamental policy of law
  • Interests of the state
  • Justice or morality

Relevance:

• Adopted widely in Model Law jurisdictions

3. Eco Swiss China Time Ltd v Benetton International NV

Principle:

• Violation of EU competition law can amount to public policy breach

Importance:

• Shows that mandatory international norms form part of transnational public policy

4. Westacre Investments Inc v Jugoimport SDPR

Principle:

• Allegations of corruption must be clearly proven
• Courts reluctant to refuse enforcement without strong evidence

Relevance:

• Supports pro-enforcement bias

5. Soleimany v Soleimany

Principle:

• Enforcement refused where contract involved illegality (smuggling)

Relevance:

• Demonstrates application of transnational public policy

6. Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation SA v Hilmarton Ltd

Principle:

• Enforcement allowed despite underlying illegality not conclusively proven

Relevance:

• Courts avoid broad application of public policy defense

7. Interaction with Bahraini Law

(a) Recognition Stage

Courts examine:

• Whether enforcement violates international public policy

(b) Annulment Stage

Under Bahrain Arbitration Law:

• Award may be set aside if:
  • Contrary to public policy of Bahrain

8. Distinction: Domestic vs Transnational Public Policy

9. Practical Examples

Violation of Transnational Public Policy:

• Bribery in contract
• Fraudulent misrepresentation
• Denial of fair hearing

Not a Violation:

• Incorrect interpretation of contract
• Errors in evidence assessment

10. Drafting & Strategic Implications

For Parties:

• Ensure compliance with:
  • Anti-corruption laws
  • Due process standards

For Arbitrators:

• Must uphold:
  • Fair procedure
  • Neutrality

11. Conclusion

In Bahraini arbitration:

• Transnational public policy acts as a safety valve
• Applied restrictively to promote enforcement of awards
• Focuses on universal legal principles, not domestic technicalities

Bahrain aligns with international best practices by balancing:

• Finality of arbitral awards
• Protection of fundamental legal norms

RELATED Blog

Maritime Arbitration in India

Legal recognition of ADR in India

Arbitration law in Afghanistan

Arbitration Law in Albania

Arbitration Law in Algeria

Arbitration Law in American Samoa (US)

Arbitration Law in Andorra

Arbitration Law in Angola

Arbitration Law in Anguilla

Arbitration Law in Antigua and Barbuda