tellectual Property Organization Of Pakistan (Ipo-Pakistan) Functions And Structure.
Intellectual Property Organization of Pakistan (IPO-Pakistan)
Functions, Structure & Case Law Analysis
I. Introduction
The Intellectual Property Organization of Pakistan (IPO-Pakistan) is the central statutory body responsible for administration, protection, enforcement, and promotion of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in Pakistan. It plays a crucial role in aligning Pakistan’s IP regime with TRIPS Agreement obligations while balancing public interest and innovation policy.
Originally established in 2005, IPO-Pakistan was later placed under the Cabinet Division to ensure stronger coordination and enforcement capacity.
II. Legal Basis of IPO-Pakistan
IPO-Pakistan operates primarily under:
Intellectual Property Organization of Pakistan Act, 2012
Trademarks Ordinance, 2001
Patents Ordinance, 2000
Copyright Ordinance, 1962
Layout-Designs of Integrated Circuits Ordinance, 2000
The 2012 Act consolidated all IP registries under one institutional umbrella.
III. Organizational Structure of IPO-Pakistan
1. Governing Body
The Policy Board (or Board of Directors) includes:
Chairperson (appointed by the Federal Government)
Secretaries from Commerce, Law, Industries, Science & Technology
Experts from academia, industry, and legal profession
Role:
Formulation of national IP policy
Oversight of registry operations
International coordination
2. Director General (DG)
The Director General is the chief executive authority.
Functions:
Day-to-day administration
Enforcement coordination
Implementation of IP reforms
Supervision of registries
3. Core Registries under IPO-Pakistan
(a) Trademarks Registry
Registration of trademarks
Opposition proceedings
Rectification and cancellation
(b) Patents Office
Patent examination and grant
Compulsory licensing matters
Patent validity assessments
(c) Copyright Office
Registration of literary, artistic, musical, and software works
Licensing and assignment records
4. Enforcement Coordination Wing
Works with:
FIA (Federal Investigation Agency)
Customs Authorities
Provincial Police
Special IP Tribunals
IV. Functions of IPO-Pakistan
1. Registration & Grant of IP Rights
IPO-Pakistan administers:
Trademark registration
Patent grants
Copyright registration (evidentiary value)
2. Enforcement Support
Although IPO-Pakistan does not adjudicate disputes, it:
Assists raids and seizures
Provides technical opinions to courts
Coordinates border enforcement measures
3. Policy & Legislative Development
IPO-Pakistan:
Drafts IP-related legislation
Advises government on TRIPS compliance
Updates IP rules in light of technological change
4. Public Awareness & Capacity Building
IP awareness campaigns
Judicial training programs
Industry consultations
5. International Cooperation
Liaison with WIPO
Bilateral IP agreements
Technical assistance programs
V. Case Laws Demonstrating Role of IPO-Pakistan
Case 1: Syed Asad Ali Shah v. Registrar of Trademarks
Issue:
Whether the Registrar of Trademarks (under IPO-Pakistan) exercised lawful discretion while refusing trademark registration.
Held:
The court held that:
The Registrar must provide reasoned decisions
Administrative discretion must comply with natural justice principles
Significance:
Strengthened accountability of IPO-Pakistan officials
Reinforced procedural fairness in IP registration
Case 2: Getz Pharma (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan
Issue:
Patent validity and compulsory licensing in pharmaceutical patents.
Held:
The court observed:
Patent monopolies are not absolute
IPO-Pakistan must balance public health with patent protection
Significance:
Clarified IPO-Pakistan’s advisory role in compulsory licensing
Demonstrated TRIPS-compatible flexibility
Case 3: Shan Foods (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Trademark Registry
Issue:
Trademark opposition and likelihood of confusion.
Held:
The court upheld the Registry’s decision that:
Consumer perception is central to trademark disputes
Visual and phonetic similarity must be strictly examined
Significance:
Validated IPO-Pakistan’s technical assessment role
Strengthened trademark opposition jurisprudence
Case 4: Exide Pakistan Ltd. v. Registrar of Trademarks
Issue:
Cancellation of a registered trademark due to non-use.
Held:
The court ruled that:
IPO-Pakistan has authority to cancel marks after statutory non-use
Trademark registration is a conditional right, not perpetual ownership
Significance:
Prevented trademark hoarding
Promoted market competition
Case 5: Pakistan Television Corporation v. Mian Muhammad Aslam
Issue:
Copyright infringement of broadcast content.
Held:
The court emphasized:
Copyright registration under IPO-Pakistan is prima facie evidence
Unauthorized rebroadcast constitutes infringement
Significance:
Strengthened enforcement value of IPO-Pakistan registrations
Protected broadcasting rights
Case 6: Pfizer Inc. v. Federation of Pakistan
Issue:
Patent infringement and parallel imports.
Held:
The court recognized:
IPO-Pakistan’s role in patent verification
Parallel imports may be allowed if statutory conditions are met
Significance:
Balanced innovation incentives with access to medicine
Clarified patent exhaustion principles
VI. Critical Evaluation of IPO-Pakistan
Strengths
✔ Centralized IP governance
✔ TRIPS-aligned framework
✔ Growing enforcement coordination
Challenges
✘ Procedural delays
✘ Limited examiner capacity
✘ Weak criminal enforcement at provincial level
VII. Conclusion
IPO-Pakistan serves as the institutional backbone of Pakistan’s IP ecosystem. Through its registries, enforcement coordination, policy role, and technical expertise, it bridges administrative action and judicial enforcement. Pakistani case law demonstrates that courts increasingly rely on IPO-Pakistan’s technical competence while insisting on transparency and fairness.
RELATED Blog
comments