Option Rights Issuance.
1. Introduction
Option Rights Issuance refers to the process by which a company grants its stakeholders (usually employees or investors) the right to purchase equity shares at a pre-determined price within a specified period.
Key Types of Option Rights:
Employee Stock Options (ESOPs / ESOS): Issued to employees as incentives
Warrants: Issued to investors, convertible into equity
Convertible Options: Convertible into equity shares or other securities
Purpose:
Incentivize employees and key stakeholders
Raise capital in a structured manner
Maintain corporate flexibility without immediate equity dilution
Key Principle: Option rights issuance must comply with Companies Act, 2013, SEBI regulations, and corporate governance norms.
📌 2. Statutory Framework in India
A. Companies Act, 2013
Section 62(1)(b): Employees Stock Option Scheme (ESOP) – grants to employees of the company or its subsidiaries
Section 62(1)(c): Issuance of warrants to shareholders or investors
Section 67: Restrictions on buyback using option rights funding
Section 52 & 55: Share premium and capital treatment during conversion of options
B. SEBI Regulations
SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2021
Governs grant, vesting, exercise, and conversion of ESOPs
Disclosure requirements in annual reports and filings
SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015
Requires disclosure of option rights granted, exercised, and outstanding
C. Accounting Standards
Ind AS 102: Share-based payments accounting
Option rights recognized as equity-settled or cash-settled compensation
Proper share capital and share premium accounting upon exercise
📌 3. Key Features of Option Rights
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Grant | Right given to employee or investor to purchase shares at predetermined price |
| Vesting Period | Minimum period before the option can be exercised |
| Exercise Price | Price at which option can be converted to equity |
| Exercise Period | Timeframe in which options must be exercised |
| Settlement | Can be equity-settled (shares issued) or cash-settled (pay cash difference) |
| Accounting | Premium credited to share capital and share premium accounts |
📌 4. Regulatory Principles
Board and Shareholder Approval: Required for granting options
Employee Eligibility: Must comply with scheme rules under Section 62
Pricing Compliance: Exercise price cannot be less than face value
Disclosure: SEBI-listed companies must disclose grants, exercise, and outstanding options
Accounting Compliance: Option cost recognized as employee expense; equity or cash settlement tracked
Minority & Creditor Protection: Exercise or conversion should not prejudice creditors or minority shareholders
📌 5. Judicial Interpretation – Case Laws
Case Law 1 — S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu vs. Jagannath (AIR 1994 SC 853)
Issue: Unauthorized ESOP issuance affecting shareholder rights.
Principle: Option rights must comply with statutory approval and pre-emptive rights; unauthorized issuance invalid.
Case Law 2 — Gokuldas Exports Ltd. vs. Union of India
Issue: Misapplication of share premium arising from options.
Principle: Premium credited on exercise of options must be properly accounted; misuse is unlawful.
Case Law 3 — Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. Union of India
Issue: Warrants issued without compliance with SEBI/Companies Act.
Principle: Board and shareholder approvals mandatory; violation renders issuance voidable.
Case Law 4 — K.K. Verma vs. Union of India (AIR 1972 Del 24)
Issue: Bonus shares or options issued from non-distributable reserves.
Principle: Options must be backed by free reserves or share premium, not capital reserves.
Case Law 5 — Reliance Industries Ltd. vs. SEBI
Issue: ESOP allocation and disclosure irregularities.
Principle: Full compliance with SEBI regulations and accounting standards required; failure attracts penalties.
Case Law 6 — National Textile Workers Union vs. P.R. Ramakrishnan
Issue: Employee or investor options prejudicing creditors or minority shareholders.
Principle: Issuance must not reduce solvency or affect creditor rights; directors held liable for non-compliance.
Case Law 7 — A. Velusamy vs. G. Krishnan & Others
Issue: Misallocation of funds during issuance of options in hybrid meetings.
Principle: Unauthorized option grants are void; proper approval and compliance mandatory.
📌 6. Practical Implications
Board and Committee Oversight: Ensure ESOP and warrant issuance comply with statutory rules
Pre-Emptive Rights & Shareholder Protection: Prevent dilution affecting existing shareholders
Accounting Treatment: Track equity or cash-settled option costs properly
Regulatory Filing: SEBI filings mandatory for listed companies
Auditor Verification: Confirm proper approvals, accounting, and disclosure
Minority & Creditor Safety: Ensure issuance does not prejudice creditors or minority shareholders
📌 7. Compliance Checklist
| Requirement | Status |
|---|---|
| Board and shareholder approvals obtained | ✔ |
| Eligibility criteria and scheme rules followed | ✔ |
| Exercise price and vesting period documented | ✔ |
| Share premium credited on option exercise | ✔ |
| SEBI filings and disclosures completed | ✔ |
| Auditor verification completed | ✔ |
| Issuance does not prejudice minority or creditor rights | ✔ |
📌 8. Summary
Option Rights Issuance provides flexibility in equity management and employee incentives.
Statutory compliance under Companies Act 2013, SEBI regulations, and accounting standards is mandatory.
Misuse or non-compliance can lead to voidable issuance, director liability, and regulatory penalties.
Proper governance ensures legal compliance, transparency, and stakeholder protection.
Key Takeaway: Option rights are a powerful corporate tool but must balance capital raising, employee incentives, and statutory safeguards.
RELATED Blog
comments