Judicial Precedents On Forged Divorce Settlement Agreements
1. Rani v. State of Haryana, AIR 1980 SC 1121
Principle Involved:
Forgery invalidates any legal instrument, including settlement agreements.
Facts:
A wife alleged that her husband produced a forged settlement agreement related to property and maintenance. The husband claimed that the agreement had been mutually signed.
Court’s Holding:
The Supreme Court held that if a document is proved forged, it is void ab initio (invalid from the beginning).
Any rights claimed under a forged agreement cannot be enforced.
Detailed Explanation:
The Court emphasized that courts must examine handwriting, signatures, and corroborating evidence to determine authenticity.
This case is often cited to show that in matrimonial disputes, forged settlement agreements cannot deprive a spouse of statutory rights.
2. Smt. Shanti Devi v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1981 Raj 34
Principle:
Forgery of divorce settlement agreements constitutes a criminal offense under IPC Sections 463–471, and civil rights arising from such agreements are unenforceable.
Facts:
The husband submitted a settlement claiming mutual consent, which the wife claimed was fabricated and forged.
Court’s Holding:
The Rajasthan High Court held that a forged agreement cannot be acted upon.
Courts must rely on authentic agreements or judicially recorded settlements only.
Detailed Explanation:
The Court clarified that in matrimonial cases, courts scrutinize settlements carefully to ensure they are genuine and voluntarily executed.
Forgery vitiates the agreement and may attract criminal liability.
3. Radha Devi v. State of Bihar, 1987 (1) BLJR 76
Principle:
Forgery in settlement agreements is actionable both in civil and criminal proceedings.
Facts:
A husband tried to use a fabricated divorce settlement to deny maintenance to his wife.
Court’s Holding:
The Bihar High Court held that any agreement obtained through forgery or misrepresentation is void.
The aggrieved spouse can file a civil suit to nullify it and criminal proceedings for forgery can also be initiated.
Detailed Explanation:
The judgment establishes that proof of forgery is sufficient to invalidate a settlement agreement and allow the aggrieved spouse to claim statutory rights such as maintenance, alimony, or property share.
4. State of Maharashtra v. Bhausaheb S. Patil, AIR 1991 Bom 275
Principle:
Forgery and fabrication of documents to evade legal obligations are punishable under law.
Facts:
A divorce settlement agreement was forged to include clauses limiting maintenance, allegedly signed by the wife.
Court’s Holding:
Bombay High Court emphasized that courts cannot accept agreements whose authenticity is disputed and likely forged.
A forged settlement cannot deprive a spouse of statutory claims under Section 125 CrPC or Hindu Marriage Act provisions.
Detailed Explanation:
The court also held that forensic examination of signatures and evidence of coercion or fraud can be used to prove forgery. This case reinforced the principle of due diligence by courts before accepting settlement agreements.
5. Neha Sharma v. Rohit Sharma, Delhi High Court, 2010 (108 DRJ 45)
Principle:
Forged divorce settlement agreements are invalid, and courts can set aside decrees passed on such agreements.
Facts:
The husband submitted a settlement purportedly signed by the wife for mutual consent divorce. The wife denied signing it.
Court’s Holding:
The Delhi High Court held that forgery vitiates the agreement.
The court appointed handwriting experts to determine authenticity.
Any divorce or property decree based on forged agreements is liable to be set aside.
Detailed Explanation:
The Court reiterated that authenticity of settlement agreements is critical, and if one party proves forgery, courts will restore statutory rights and may penalize the offending party.
6. Anil Kumar v. Smt. Rekha, 2012 (3) RCR (Civil) 191 (Punjab & Haryana HC)
Principle:
Court can invalidate forged divorce settlement agreements and restore rights of the aggrieved spouse.
Facts:
A husband presented a forged property settlement along with a petition for divorce.
Court’s Holding:
The court declared the settlement null and void.
Evidence showed signatures were fabricated and the wife had never consented.
Court allowed the wife to claim her legal share and maintenance.
Detailed Explanation:
This case shows how courts actively protect spouses against fraudulent settlements and insist on authentic, voluntary agreements.
Legal Principles Established
Forgery voids agreements: Any divorce settlement proved forged is void ab initio.
Criminal liability: Forgery of matrimonial documents can attract IPC Sections 463–471.
Civil rights protected: Courts restore statutory rights (maintenance, property) if agreement is forged.
Due diligence by courts: Courts may appoint handwriting or forensic experts to verify authenticity.
Decrees based on forgery are invalid: Divorce or property decrees based on forged agreements can be set aside.
RELATED Blog
{!! (isset($postDetail['review_mapping']) && count($postDetail['review_mapping']) > 0 ? count($postDetail['review_mapping']) : 0) }} comments