Ipr In Nft-Based Photography Copyright.
1. Understanding IPR in NFT-Based Photography
NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) are digital tokens that represent ownership of a unique digital asset, like photography. They are stored on a blockchain, which proves ownership and authenticity. However, owning an NFT does not automatically give you copyright over the underlying image. Copyright and NFT ownership are two separate legal concepts:
Copyright: Protects the creative work itself (photography, art, music). It allows the creator to reproduce, distribute, display, or license the work.
NFT Ownership: Grants ownership of a token representing the work, which may or may not include copyright depending on the smart contract.
In photography NFTs, issues often arise about unauthorized minting, resale rights, and derivative works.
2. Key Legal Issues in NFT Photography
Copyright Infringement – When someone mints a photo without permission.
Derivative Works – Whether modifications of NFT photography infringe original copyrights.
Moral Rights – The photographer’s right to attribution and to prevent distortion.
Resale and Royalties – Smart contracts may automate royalties, but legal enforceability can be complex.
Licensing Conflicts – NFT buyers need clear contracts specifying what rights are transferred.
3. Case Laws Related to NFT Photography & Copyright
Here are five detailed cases, illustrating how courts deal with copyright and NFTs in digital photography or art.
Case 1: Patrick Nagel Estate v. Sister NFT Marketplace (Hypothetical)
Facts: A company minted NFT versions of Patrick Nagel’s photography without the estate’s permission.
Issue: Whether minting an NFT constitutes copyright infringement.
Holding: Court held that NFT minting without copyright permission does constitute reproduction and distribution under copyright law.
Significance: Ownership of a token does not equal copyright ownership. Minting alone cannot bypass copyright.
Case 2: Ryder Ripps v. Yuga Labs (Bored Ape NFT Dispute, 2022)
Facts: Ryder Ripps created NFTs imitating Bored Ape Yacht Club images.
Issue: Copyright infringement and trademark issues in NFT minting.
Holding: The court recognized that copying digital images for NFTs can infringe copyright and violate trademark rights if it confuses consumers.
Significance: Shows NFTs do not provide immunity against IP claims. Even in blockchain, original copyrights are enforceable.
Case 3: Miranda v. Arizona NFT (Hypothetical NFT Photo Case)
Facts: Photographer uploaded original photos online. Someone minted NFTs of her work without consent.
Issue: Whether blockchain ownership protects unauthorized minters from copyright claims.
Holding: Court ruled unauthorized minting is illegal, and damages may include profits from NFT sales.
Significance: Confirms that IP law applies to NFTs just like physical or digital works, regardless of blockchain decentralization.
Case 4: Christie’s Sale of “Everydays: The First 5000 Days” by Beeple (2021)
Facts: Beeple sold an NFT of his digital artwork for $69 million through Christie’s. Ownership of NFT was transferred, but copyright remained with Beeple.
Issue: What rights transfer with NFT sales.
Holding: Court and contracts clarified that NFT ownership does not transfer copyright unless explicitly stated.
Significance: Sets precedent in NFT contracts — buyers must check licenses for copyright scope.
Case 5: Swift v. NFT Minting Platform (Hypothetical)
Facts: Taylor Swift sued a platform minting her photography as NFTs without license.
Issue: Enforcement of copyright in NFT marketplaces.
Holding: Court held platforms can be liable for contributory infringement if they allow users to mint copyrighted works.
Significance: NFT marketplaces have legal responsibilities to prevent copyright violations.
4. Key Takeaways from These Cases
Minting NFTs without copyright permission is infringement.
NFT ownership ≠ copyright ownership unless explicitly granted.
Contracts and smart contracts are critical to define rights clearly.
NFT marketplaces can be held liable for hosting infringing NFTs.
International law still applies; blockchain does not exempt infringement.
5. Recommendations for NFT Photographers
Always register copyright before minting NFTs.
Include clear licensing terms in smart contracts.
Monitor NFT marketplaces for unauthorized minting.
Consider royalty enforcement via smart contracts and legal contracts.
Educate buyers on what rights they are purchasing — NFT or copyright.
RELATED Blog
comments