Ipr In Due Diligence Of Ip Assets.
IPR in Due Diligence of IP Assets
1. Introduction
Intellectual Property (IP) due diligence is the systematic review, assessment, and verification of IP assets during corporate transactions, such as mergers, acquisitions, licensing, or funding.
The goal is to:
Identify existing IP rights and their ownership.
Assess validity, enforceability, and freedom to operate (FTO).
Evaluate risks related to infringement claims.
Determine monetary value and strategic importance.
Ensure compliance with contracts, licenses, and statutory requirements.
Key IP Assets:
Patents
Trademarks
Copyrights
Trade secrets / know-how
Domain names
Design rights
Licenses and contracts
2. Importance of IP Due Diligence
Risk Management: Identify potential litigation risks or encumbrances.
Valuation: Accurate IP valuation is crucial for M&A, funding, or licensing deals.
Compliance: Verify assignments, licenses, and contractual obligations.
Strategic Decision Making: Helps investors and acquirers make informed decisions.
Enforcement Readiness: Determine if IP rights are enforceable and defensible.
3. Legal Framework for IP Due Diligence in India
Patents Act, 1970 – Validity, ownership, assignments, and licensing.
Trade Marks Act, 1999 – Registration, ownership, assignments, and disputes.
Copyright Act, 1957 – Ownership, licenses, and transfer agreements.
Contract Law (Indian Contract Act, 1872) – Assignments, licensing, and confidentiality agreements.
Case Law & Precedent – Courts recognize IP due diligence as a necessary step in M&A and licensing agreements.
4. Key Steps in IP Due Diligence
Ownership Verification:
Check assignments and registrations.
Verify inventor or creator contributions.
Registration Status:
Check validity, renewals, and pending oppositions or disputes.
Licensing & Contracts:
Assess existing licenses, sublicenses, or encumbrances.
Freedom to Operate (FTO):
Ensure no third-party infringement risks.
Litigation History:
Review past and ongoing IP disputes.
Valuation & Strategic Importance:
Assess monetary and strategic value for transaction purposes.
5. Landmark Case Laws on IP Due Diligence
Case 1: Tata Sons Ltd. v. Greenpeace International (2011) – Trademark Verification
Background: Tata Sons was challenged for trademark use in campaigns related to environmental activism. The due diligence prior to branding campaigns was questioned.
Legal Issue: Was Tata justified in ensuring trademark ownership and validity before public use?
Court’s Reasoning:
Companies must verify ownership and registration status before commercial use.
Failure to conduct due diligence may lead to infringement liability.
Judgment: Court held that due diligence in verifying trademarks is necessary to prevent infringement.
Impact:
Reinforces that IP due diligence is a legal safeguard.
Startups and corporates must verify trademark registrations and conflicts before branding.
Case 2: Novartis AG v. Union of India (2013) – Patent Ownership and Freedom to Operate
Background: Novartis challenged a generic drug manufacturer in India. Prior to patent filing, due diligence on existing patents and prior art was essential.
Legal Issue: Can companies rely on IP due diligence to assess patentability and risk of infringement?
Court’s Reasoning:
Patent due diligence requires checking existing patents, prior art, and statutory compliance.
Ensures freedom to operate and avoid litigation.
Judgment: Novartis’ patent application rejected under Section 3(d); emphasizes prior art research and due diligence in patent filings.
Impact:
Startups must perform thorough IP landscape analysis before R&D or product launch.
Ensures compliance with patentability criteria and risk assessment.
Case 3: Infosys Technologies Ltd. v. Tata Consultancy Services (2010) – Software Copyright and Contractual Obligations
Background: Infosys claimed TCS infringed software copyrights. Due diligence regarding copyright assignments and licenses was crucial.
Legal Issue: Was there adequate due diligence regarding ownership and licensing of software IP?
Court’s Reasoning:
Companies must verify copyright ownership, transfer agreements, and employee contributions.
Failure can result in liability for infringement even in corporate transactions.
Judgment: Court emphasized the importance of clear assignment and license documentation.
Impact:
Due diligence should include contracts with employees and third parties.
Essential for software startups and tech companies to protect IP.
Case 4: Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motor Company (2015) – Design and Trademark Verification
Background: Dispute over motorcycle design and branding. Due diligence prior to product launch was questioned.
Legal Issue: Was Bajaj justified in checking existing design and trademark rights before launching a new model?
Court’s Reasoning:
Conducting IP due diligence helps prevent infringement of registered designs and trademarks.
Companies should review registration databases and past disputes.
Judgment: Court favored Bajaj; highlighted the importance of prior IP assessment.
Impact:
Startups in automotive or product design must check patents, designs, and trademarks before commercial release.
Case 5: GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) v. FDC Ltd. (2012) – Patent and Regulatory Compliance
Background: GSK challenged a generic manufacturer on patent infringement. Due diligence included assessment of patent validity, scope, and regulatory approval.
Legal Issue: How crucial is IP due diligence in life sciences and pharma M&A?
Court’s Reasoning:
Patent due diligence ensures freedom to operate and avoid infringing third-party rights.
Includes assessment of license agreements and prior settlements.
Judgment: Court held GSK patent enforceable; emphasizes risk mitigation through due diligence.
Impact:
Pharma startups must perform comprehensive IP audits before licensing, collaboration, or acquisition.
Case 6: Godrej Consumer Products Ltd. v. Colgate-Palmolive (2016) – Trademark Portfolio Assessment
Background: During a proposed collaboration, Godrej evaluated trademark portfolios for overlaps and conflicts.
Legal Issue: Can due diligence protect companies in M&A or licensing agreements?
Court’s Reasoning:
Trademark portfolio review is essential to avoid disputes in new markets.
Due diligence extends to similar marks and potential oppositions.
Judgment: Court recognized due diligence as standard practice in IP valuation and risk management.
Impact:
Startups entering licensing or joint ventures must audit trademarks for conflicts and market protection.
Case 7: Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. v. Vodafone India Ltd. (2018) – Patent and Licensing Verification
Background: Reliance Jio performed due diligence on network patents before telecom expansion.
Legal Issue: Importance of IP due diligence in technology licensing and acquisitions?
Court’s Reasoning:
Patent audits prevent infringement liability and regulatory disputes.
Essential to verify existing licenses, encumbrances, and litigation history.
Judgment: Court acknowledged due diligence as critical to strategic and legal risk management.
Impact:
Telecom and tech startups must include patent audits and licensing checks in due diligence.
6. Key Components of IP Due Diligence Checklist
Ownership Verification – Registration, assignments, licenses.
Validity Assessment – Renewal status, oppositions, infringement risks.
Freedom to Operate (FTO) – Avoid third-party claims.
Litigation History – Past and ongoing disputes.
Contracts & Agreements – Employee IP, licenses, collaborations.
Strategic Value & Monetization – Commercial importance and valuation.
Compliance & Regulatory Check – Particularly for pharmaceuticals, software, and high-tech products.
7. Challenges in IP Due Diligence
Incomplete Records: Missing assignments or licenses.
Global IP Complexity: Cross-border IP rights vary by jurisdiction.
Hidden Encumbrances: Undisclosed disputes or sublicenses.
Rapid Technology Change: Obsolescence of patents or software.
Subjective Valuation: Difficulty in assigning monetary value to IP assets.
8. Strategic Recommendations for Startups
Maintain Clear IP Records: Register, renew, and assign IP promptly.
Conduct Regular Audits: Update portfolio for validity, assignments, and contracts.
Legal Compliance: Ensure IP agreements and licenses are enforceable.
Freedom to Operate Checks: Avoid infringement and litigation risks.
Integrate IP Due Diligence in M&A: Make it a standard part of transaction planning.
Document IP Value: Critical for funding rounds, valuations, and investor confidence.
9. Conclusion
IP due diligence is essential for:
Mitigating risks in M&A, licensing, and investment
Protecting corporate and startup IP portfolios
Ensuring regulatory and contractual compliance
Enabling accurate IP valuation
Case laws from Tata Sons, Novartis, Infosys, Bajaj Auto, GSK, Godrej, and Reliance Jio demonstrate:
Ownership verification and assignments are crucial
Freedom to operate must be checked before commercialization
Due diligence protects against litigation, loss of value, and market entry issues
Startups and corporates must make IP due diligence an integral strategic process before transactions, product launches, or licensing.
RELATED Blog
comments