Ipr In Corporate Governance Of Design Ip Assets.
IPR in Corporate Governance of Design IP Assets
1. Introduction
Design IP assets refer to intellectual property related to industrial designs, including:
Product designs
Packaging
Graphical interfaces
Fashion designs
Architectural layouts
Corporate governance of design IP assets involves policies, strategies, and oversight mechanisms to manage, protect, and leverage design IP within a company. Effective governance ensures:
Proper registration and protection of design rights
Strategic exploitation of designs for commercial advantage
Risk mitigation (infringement, disputes, or mismanagement)
Alignment with corporate goals
2. Key Issues in Corporate Governance of Design IP Assets
(a) Ownership and Assignment
Design IP created by employees, contractors, or collaborators must be clearly assigned to the company.
Employment contracts and assignment clauses are critical.
(b) Registration and Protection
Ensuring timely registration of industrial designs.
Maintaining renewal and documentation compliance.
(c) Licensing and Monetization
Corporate strategies often involve licensing designs to third parties.
Smart licensing agreements and royalty management are key.
(d) Risk Management
Monitoring potential infringement.
Enforcement strategies (civil and criminal remedies).
Insurance and IP audits.
(e) Strategic Use
Aligning design IP with brand value, product differentiation, and competitive advantage.
3. Important Case Laws
Here are six key case laws relevant to corporate governance and design IP assets:
Case 1: Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (US, 2012)
Facts
Apple sued Samsung for infringing its smartphone design patents and trade dress (overall look and feel).
Decision
The court recognized design patents and trade dress as enforceable IP assets.
Awarded damages for willful infringement.
Relevance
Highlights the need for corporate governance to monitor competitor activity.
Demonstrates the commercial value of design IP as strategic assets.
Companies must actively manage and enforce design rights to protect market share.
Case 2: Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent (US, 2012)
Facts
Christian Louboutin sued YSL for selling red-soled shoes allegedly copying Louboutin’s signature design.
Decision
Court upheld that specific design features (red sole) are protected under design IP.
Trademarked color can be considered part of design IP under certain circumstances.
Relevance
Importance of corporate governance to protect signature designs.
Licensing and branding strategies must integrate design IP protection.
Case 3: Crocs, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (US, 2010)
Facts
Crocs sought relief against companies making shoes with similar design features.
Decision
ITC ruled in favor of Crocs.
Prevented import of infringing products.
Relevance
Companies must monitor international markets to enforce design rights.
Governance mechanisms should include global IP enforcement strategies.
Case 4: Ferrari S.p.A. v. McLaren Automotive Ltd. (UK, 2005)
Facts
Dispute involved design similarities in car exteriors.
Decision
Court ruled that Ferrari’s design features were protected as registered designs.
Injunction and damages granted.
Relevance
Employee and contractor agreements must clearly assign design ownership.
Governance requires vigilance on design adoption in competitive products.
Case 5: Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG (US, 2015)
Facts
Nike claimed Adidas copied specific footwear design elements.
Decision
Court examined distinctiveness and originality of designs.
Enforcement depended on design registration and branding integration.
Relevance
Shows strategic importance of maintaining a design IP portfolio.
Corporate governance involves tracking competitive infringements.
Case 6: Reebok International v. Footstar, Inc. (US, 2007)
Facts
Reebok claimed that Footstar’s shoe designs infringed its registered designs.
Decision
Court emphasized design originality and scope of protection.
Reebok awarded damages and injunction.
Relevance
Highlights corporate governance role in monitoring licensing compliance.
Proper documentation of design IP assignments critical in disputes.
4. Legal Principles Emerging from Case Law
Design IP as Strategic Asset: Courts consistently treat registered designs and distinctive visual features as enforceable and commercially valuable IP.
Ownership and Assignment: Clear assignment of rights in employment/contract agreements is critical.
Enforcement and Monitoring: Corporate governance must include mechanisms for active monitoring of potential infringement, including international markets.
Licensing Compliance: Mismanagement of licenses can lead to disputes; governance must track licensed use.
Integration with Branding: Design IP often overlaps with trademarks; governance strategies should integrate branding and design protection.
5. Best Practices for Corporate Governance of Design IP
Maintain a centralized IP register for all design assets.
Ensure employee agreements include IP assignment clauses.
Regular IP audits to identify unregistered or expired designs.
Integrate IP strategy into business planning, including licensing and monetization.
Monitor competitor designs and marketplaces for infringement.
Implement global enforcement policies if designs are marketed internationally.
6. Challenges
Distinguishing between functional and ornamental designs.
Cross-border enforcement complexity.
Keeping track of numerous design registrations.
Licensing disputes due to ambiguous terms.
Aligning IP governance with evolving corporate strategy.
7. Conclusion
Design IP assets are critical corporate assets that contribute to brand identity, product differentiation, and commercial success. Effective corporate governance ensures:
Proper registration and assignment
Strategic enforcement
Monetization through licensing
Risk mitigation for infringement
Case law clearly demonstrates that courts value design IP highly, and companies that fail to implement robust governance risk financial loss and competitive disadvantage.
RELATED Blog
comments