Ipr In Blockchain-Based Copyright Protection.
IPR in Blockchain-Based Copyright Protection
1. Introduction
Blockchain technology is a decentralized digital ledger that records transactions permanently and transparently. In copyright protection, blockchain is increasingly used to:
Register creative works
Prove authorship and ownership
Timestamp content creation
Track licensing and royalty payments
Prevent piracy and unauthorized distribution
Blockchain-based copyright systems combine technological innovation with intellectual property law to improve transparency and reduce disputes over ownership.
2. Key Features of Blockchain for Copyright Protection
A. Immutable Records
Blockchain stores data in blocks that cannot be altered once validated. This creates:
Reliable proof of creation date
Evidence of ownership history
Transparent licensing records
B. Smart Contracts
Smart contracts automatically execute terms such as:
Royalty payments
Licensing permissions
Distribution conditions
Example: When a song is used commercially, payment can automatically transfer to the creator.
C. Decentralization
Unlike centralized copyright registries:
No single authority controls the system.
Reduces manipulation risks.
D. Tokenization and NFTs
Blockchain allows creators to mint NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), representing ownership or licensing rights in:
Digital art
Journalism content
Music
Video content
3. Legal Issues in Blockchain-Based Copyright
(1) Legal Recognition of Blockchain Evidence
Courts must determine whether blockchain records:
Are admissible as evidence.
Establish ownership legally.
(2) Ownership vs Token Ownership
Owning an NFT does not automatically mean owning copyright unless explicitly transferred.
(3) Jurisdiction Challenges
Blockchain operates globally:
Determining applicable law becomes complex.
Copyright rules differ across countries.
(4) Liability for Infringing Content
If copyrighted material is stored or tokenized without permission:
Who is responsible?
Platform developers?
Users?
(5) Enforcement Issues
Blockchain records are permanent, but copyright law still relies on traditional courts for enforcement.
4. Important Case Laws
(1) A&M Records v. Napster (USA)
Facts:
Napster allowed peer-to-peer sharing of copyrighted music files without authorization.
Legal Issue:
Whether decentralized technology platforms can be liable for copyright infringement.
Decision:
Court held Napster liable for contributory infringement.
Relevance to Blockchain:
Even decentralized systems may face liability if facilitating infringement.
Blockchain platforms hosting pirated content may face similar legal scrutiny.
(2) Capitol Records v. ReDigi
Facts:
ReDigi created a digital marketplace allowing resale of “used” digital music files.
Legal Issue:
Whether transferring digital files constitutes unauthorized reproduction.
Decision:
Court ruled resale involved making new copies, violating copyright law.
Application:
Blockchain-based resale of digital assets must consider reproduction rights.
Tokenizing copyrighted content may still infringe if copying occurs.
(3) Hermès International v. Rothschild (MetaBirkins NFT Case)
Facts:
Artist created NFTs inspired by Hermès Birkin bags.
Legal Issue:
Whether NFTs using brand-related imagery violate IP rights.
Decision:
Court found trademark infringement.
Relevance:
NFT minting does not exempt creators from copyright or trademark law.
Blockchain does not override traditional IP protections.
(4) Miramax v. Quentin Tarantino (NFT Rights Dispute)
Facts:
Tarantino announced NFTs based on the film “Pulp Fiction,” leading to disputes with Miramax regarding ownership rights.
Legal Issue:
Whether existing contracts allowed NFT-based exploitation.
Importance:
Blockchain exploitation must align with existing copyright agreements.
New technology does not create new rights automatically.
(5) Associated Press v. Meltwater
Facts:
Automated aggregation of news excerpts without authorization.
Legal Principle:
Copyright infringement applies even to automated systems.
Blockchain Relevance:
Blockchain-based news licensing systems must respect copyright limits.
Recording transactions on blockchain does not legalize unauthorized use.
(6) Authors Guild v. Google
Facts:
Google digitized books to create searchable databases.
Decision:
Held transformative and fair use.
Application:
Blockchain registries storing metadata may be acceptable if transformative.
Full reproduction may require licensing.
(7) Oracle America v. Google
Facts:
Use of API structure raised questions about copying and innovation.
Legal Principle:
Transformative use and innovation balanced against copyright protection.
Blockchain Relevance:
Blockchain platforms using existing copyrighted datasets must ensure transformative use.
5. Advantages of Blockchain in Copyright Protection
Transparent ownership verification
Reduced disputes about authorship
Automated royalty distribution
Better tracking of content usage
Increased trust between creators and users
6. Challenges and Limitations
Legal recognition varies across jurisdictions.
Difficult to remove infringing content due to immutability.
Regulatory uncertainty.
Environmental concerns (energy usage in some blockchains).
Identity verification issues.
7. Future Legal Developments
Integration of copyright registries with blockchain systems.
Smart contract-based licensing frameworks.
AI and blockchain combined for copyright enforcement.
International harmonization of blockchain evidence standards.
8. Conclusion
Blockchain-based copyright protection offers a transformative approach to managing intellectual property by enhancing transparency, automating licensing, and improving proof of ownership. However, traditional copyright laws remain fully applicable. Courts emphasize that blockchain technology does not eliminate infringement risks; instead, it must operate within established legal frameworks. As case law evolves, clearer standards for NFT rights, digital resale, and decentralized platforms will shape the future of copyright protection.
RELATED Blog
comments