Incorporation of Precautionary Principle in Environmental Legislation
1. What is the Precautionary Principle?
The Precautionary Principle is a strategy to cope with possible risks where scientific understanding is yet incomplete. It states that if an action or policy has the potential to cause harm to the public or the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus, the burden of proof falls on those advocating the action.
This principle is widely used in environmental protection laws and policy-making to ensure that a lack of complete knowledge does not justify inaction when there is a threat of serious or irreversible harm.
2. Origin and Global Recognition
The principle gained prominence during the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992), particularly under Principle 15, which states:
“Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.”
3. Incorporation into Environmental Legislation
International Level
The principle has been incorporated into several international treaties and conventions, such as:
The Convention on Biological Diversity (1992)
The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992)
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (2000)
National Level – India as a Case Study
In India, although not originally codified in early environmental statutes, the Precautionary Principle has been read into the Constitution and environmental law through judicial activism, especially via Public Interest Litigations (PILs).
4. Judicial Interpretation and Case Law
✅ A landmark case: Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996)
Citation: AIR 1996 SC 2715
Facts:
The case was filed against tanneries in Tamil Nadu that were polluting the Palar River. The untreated effluents caused environmental and health issues.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court explicitly recognized the Precautionary Principle as part of Indian environmental law.
The court declared that the principle is part of the "law of the land" under Article 21 (Right to Life), Articles 47, 48-A, and 51-A(g) of the Constitution.
It held that:
“The precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle are part of the environmental law of the country.”
Key Points from the Judgment:
Environmental measures must anticipate, prevent, and attack the causes of environmental degradation.
Where there are threats of serious environmental damage, lack of scientific certainty should not be used to postpone measures.
The onus of proof lies on the actor or developer to show that the action is environmentally benign.
✅ Another significant case: A.P. Pollution Control Board v. Prof. M.V. Nayudu (1999)
Citation: AIR 1999 SC 812
Facts:
The case dealt with the approval given to establish an industry in a catchment area which might affect the water bodies used for drinking water.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court elaborated further on the precautionary principle, emphasizing its importance in risk-based decision-making.
The Court noted that modern environmental issues often involve complex scientific and technical matters, and where uncertainty exists, preventive steps must be taken.
✅ Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India (2000)
Citation: AIR 2000 SC 3751
Key Point:
While this case did not reject the precautionary principle, the court clarified that a balance must be maintained between development and environment.
The principle was invoked but limited in scope due to what the court saw as adequate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies being done before the Sardar Sarovar Dam project.
5. Features of the Principle in Law
Burden of Proof Shifted: The developer must prove that their action will not cause harm.
Anticipatory Action: Authorities must act before harm occurs.
Scientific Uncertainty Not a Ground for Delay: Even if science is inconclusive, precautionary measures must be adopted.
6. Application in Indian Environmental Law
Although not codified in a single statute, the precautionary principle is integrated across laws such as:
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972
Forest Conservation Act, 1980
Additionally, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) frequently invokes this principle in its judgments.
7. Criticism and Challenges
Over-precaution can hinder development, especially in countries needing infrastructure and industrial growth.
Ambiguity in application: Courts and policymakers often interpret it differently.
Risk of misuse: It can be invoked to block development projects without substantial reason.
8. Conclusion
The Precautionary Principle plays a vital role in modern environmental governance. It ensures that irreversible environmental damage is avoided, even in the absence of complete scientific evidence. Through landmark judgments, particularly Vellore Citizens' Welfare Forum, Indian courts have incorporated this principle into the core of environmental jurisprudence.
It strikes a balance between development and sustainability, making sure that the environment is protected for future generations, even in the face of uncertainty.
RELATED Blog
0 comments