Ifrs Application In Finnish Companies.
IFRS Application in Finnish Companies
1. Background & Legal Framework
a. Mandatory IFRS Adoption
In Finland, IFRS Standards (as adopted by the EU) are mandatory for consolidated financial statements of companies whose shares or debt instruments are traded on a regulated market (e.g., NASDAQ Helsinki).
This mandate stems from EU IAS Regulation (No. 1606/2002), implemented in Finnish law and the Finnish Accounting Act.
b. Optional IFRS Use
For companies whose securities are not publicly traded, IFRS is permitted but not required if the company’s accounts are audited.
The choice between Finnish GAAP (FAS) and IFRS affects financial comparability, disclosure, and international reporting.
c. Scope of IFRS
IFRS applies to:
Consolidated accounts of public interest entities (listed companies, credit institutions, insurers, etc.).
Optional use in separate statutory accounts for certain non‑listed audited companies.
2. Why Finnish Companies Use IFRS
a. Transparency & Comparability
IFRS increases global comparability and investor confidence because:
It harmonizes accounting measurement bases (e.g., fair value, revenue recognition).
It obligates extensive financial statement disclosures — often more detailed than Finnish GAAP.
b. International Financing & Listings
Finnish firms aspiring to international capital markets or cross‑border financing often adopt IFRS to meet investor expectations.
c. Group Consolidation
Subsidiaries of multinational companies operating in Finland typically prepare IFRS financials to align with global consolidated reporting.
3. Practical Accounting Impacts of IFRS vs FAS
The application of IFRS affects:
a. Asset & Liability Valuation
IFRS uses fair value measurements (e.g., investment property under IAS 40) whereas FAS historically relied more on historical cost.
b. Business Combinations & Goodwill
IFRS 3 requires identifying intangible assets and testing goodwill annually for impairment — a different treatment from some historic FAS approaches.
c. Leases
Under IFRS 16, most leases appear on the balance sheet, affecting assets and liabilities.
d. Financial Instruments
IFRS 9 introduces different classification, measurement, and impairment models for financial instruments compared to FAS.
4. Judicial & Regulatory Decisions Impacting IFRS Application
As noted, there are few strictly IFRS‑specific Finnish court rulings because courts generally interpret statutory accounting requirements under the Finnish Accounting Act. However, related case decisions provide important compliance insights:
Case Law 1: KHO:2021:73 — Supreme Administrative Court (Finland)
Principle: Courts recognize that while Finnish law mandates GAAP/FAS or IFRS, accounting figures generated under internationally recognized accounting regimes may inform legal analyses such as tax assessments if justified and comparable.
Significance: Although not a direct IFRS adoption compliance case, it shows courts may consider IFRS or other recognized accounting treatments in a legal dispute even when Finnish GAAP is statutory.
Case Law 2: KHO Interpretation on Accounting Reports (General Enforcement Context)
Principle: The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court confirms that Finnish accounting law requires financial statements but does not require a specific GAAP choice (e.g., IFRS) unless law or trading status demands it.
Significance: Validates the legal option of IFRS use where EU law or corporate status triggers that requirement.
Note: Explicit IFRS vs. FAS litigation is often embedded in audit, taxation, and financial reporting disputes, not always labeled “IFRS” in court titles.
5. Regulatory Compliance and Enforcement
a. Filing with Finnish Authorities
Companies failing to file mandatory IFRS consolidated financials can face fines, deregistration, or enforcement under Finnish company reporting laws.
Regulators emphasize accurate IFRS disclosure per EU endorsement.
b. Auditor Role
Finnish audit practice follows ISA (International Standards on Auditing), and courts (e.g., in KHO 583/2020) confirm that ISA compliance is part of good audit practice — indirectly supporting IFRS‑based audits.
6. Challenges and Judicial Issues in Practice
While Finland hasn’t produced landmark IFRS violation cases like some other jurisdictions, academic and regulatory case studies highlight real challenges:
a. IFRS vs FAS Reconciliation for Tax
Finnish tax law historically ties corporate tax figures to FAS results. This creates conflicts when IFRS financials diverge from tax bases, potentially leading to legal disputes or complex reconciliations.
b. Comparability & Reliability
Studies comparing IFRS and FAS in Finnish firms show differing asset valuations and earnings, a root cause in many corporate reporting disputes.
c. Enforcement Quality
Regulatory focus on accurate transition disclosures and consistent IFRS application can lead to compliance checks and potential remedial measures, even where courts aren’t directly involved.
7. Best Practices for Finnish Companies Using IFRS
Understand Statutory Triggers: Public listing or regulated trading status mandates IFRS consolidated reporting.
Prepare IFRS Reconciliations: Especially when local tax law relies on Finnish GAAP figures.
Ensure Audit Alignment: Audit reports should clearly state IFRS compliance, following ISA frameworks.
Disclose Transitions: First‑time adopters should disclose IFRS 1 transition effects.
Stay Updated: IFRS evolves (e.g., IFRS 19, IFRS 18) with EU endorsement impacting reporting.
8. Summary
IFRS reporting is legally mandated for most Finnish listed and regulated market companies, aligning them with global standards and the EU IAS regulation.
IFRS adoption enhances comparability, transparency, and investor confidence, but requires careful transition, disclosure, and reconciliation with domestic GAAP and tax law.
Direct Finnish case law on IFRS adoption disputes is limited, but relevant administrative decisions show courts recognize and engage with international accounting principles when interpreting statutory compliance and related legal obligations.
RELATED Blog
comments