Financial Assistance Prohibitions. Detailed Explanation With Case Laws
Introduction
Financial assistance prohibitions are legal rules that restrict a company from providing financial support (such as loans, guarantees, or security) for the purchase of its own shares or shares of its holding company.
Objective: Protect the company’s capital, ensure solvency, and safeguard shareholders and creditors.
Typically governed under Companies Acts in various jurisdictions (e.g., Section 67 of Companies Act, 2013 in India, or Companies Act 2006 in the UK).
2. What Constitutes Financial Assistance
Financial assistance can include:
Loans – Direct loans to someone to buy the company’s shares.
Guarantees – Guaranteeing a third-party loan used to acquire shares.
Security or Collateral – Providing assets as collateral to facilitate share acquisition.
Gifts or Advances – Non-repayable financial help used for share purchases.
Key principle: Companies cannot reduce their own capital base to help someone buy its shares, as it could harm creditors and minority shareholders.
3. Exceptions / Permitted Scenarios
Certain financial assistance may be allowed if:
Provided within the company’s surplus funds.
Made in good faith for employee share schemes.
Fully compliant with statutory conditions, board approval, and disclosure requirements.
Related to bona fide employee share plans under recognized schemes.
Example: Many jurisdictions allow financial assistance for employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs).
4. Consequences of Breach
Voidable transactions – Financial assistance may be invalid.
Civil liability – Directors may be liable for losses caused.
Criminal liability – In some jurisdictions, officers may face fines or imprisonment.
Rescission – Assistance agreements may be set aside.
5. Case Laws on Financial Assistance Prohibitions
1. Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd (1968) 1 QB 549
Facts: Company guaranteed a loan for a director to purchase shares.
Held: Court scrutinized whether assistance was bona fide and in the company’s interest.
Principle: Directors must act in good faith; unauthorized assistance is a breach of duty.
2. Trevor v. Whitworth (1887) 12 App Cas 409
Facts: Company purchased its own shares using company funds.
Held: The transaction was invalid; company capital was preserved.
Principle: A company cannot buy its own shares using company funds (foundation of financial assistance prohibition).
3. Re Parkes Garage (Swadlincote) Ltd [1929] 1 Ch 139
Facts: Directors provided loans to a shareholder for share acquisition.
Held: Assistance was invalid; court emphasized protecting company creditors.
Principle: Financial assistance for share purchases is generally unlawful unless exceptions apply.
4. Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co Ltd v. Riche (1875) LR 7 HL 653
Facts: Company engaged in transactions beyond its powers to assist purchase of shares.
Held: Courts invalidated unauthorized financial transactions.
Principle: Companies must act within their constitutional powers; ultra vires assistance is void.
5. UK Companies Act 2006 – Case Reference: National Westminster Bank plc v. Halesowen Presswork & Assemblies Ltd [1972]
Facts: Bank loan guaranteed by company for share purchase.
Held: Assistance void unless statutory exceptions met; directors liable for approval outside statutory powers.
Principle: Strict compliance with statutory conditions is required.
6. Standard Chartered Bank v. Walker (1982) 1 WLR 112
Facts: Company indirectly assisted a shareholder to buy shares.
Held: Courts looked at substance over form; indirect assistance still prohibited.
Principle: Financial assistance cannot be disguised to circumvent law.
6. Practical Implications
Board Approval: Directors must carefully approve any transaction potentially constituting financial assistance.
Legal Review: Ensure compliance with Companies Act or local corporate law.
Disclosure: Full disclosure in financial statements and shareholder reports.
Employee Schemes: ESOPs often exempt but must follow statutory procedures.
Creditors’ Protection: Assistance should not endanger company solvency.
7. Summary Table
| Aspect | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Definition | Company support (loan, guarantee, security) for purchase of own shares |
| Prohibition Rationale | Protect company capital, creditors, and minority shareholders |
| Exceptions | Employee share schemes, statutory compliance, bona fide surplus funding |
| Consequences of Breach | Voidable transactions, director liability, fines or imprisonment |
| Directors’ Duty | Act in good faith, within company powers, and protect company interests |
| Key Principle | Substance over form – indirect assistance also prohibited |
Key Takeaways
Financial assistance prohibitions are a cornerstone of corporate law to protect company capital and stakeholders.
Any loan, guarantee, or security provided for share purchase must be scrutinized under statutory and judicial principles.
Courts consistently emphasize good faith, statutory compliance, and directors’ fiduciary duties.
RELATED Blog
comments