Fdi Approval Routes And Compliance
1. Introduction
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) refers to investment by a foreign investor into an Indian company through:
Equity shares
Fully/partly paid shares
Compulsorily convertible preference shares/debentures
FDI is governed under:
Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999
FDI Policy (DPIIT / Ministry of Commerce & Industry)
RBI Master Directions and Circulars
The FDI policy specifies sectoral caps, entry routes, and compliance obligations.
2. FDI Approval Routes
FDI in India is allowed under two main routes:
A. Automatic Route
Definition: No prior approval required from Government of India.
Process:
Investor invests directly in Indian company in permitted sectors.
Post-investment, investor must report to RBI within 30 days via Form FC-GPR / FC-TRS.
Sectors: Most sectors (IT, manufacturing, pharma, etc.)
Key Requirement: Compliance with sectoral FDI caps and pricing guidelines.
Advantages:
Fast, simple
Less bureaucratic involvement
Example: FDI up to 100% in IT services under automatic route.
B. Government (Approval) Route
Definition: Prior approval of the Government of India (via DPIIT/FIPB or Ministry) required.
Process:
Submit application to concerned ministry
Government examines policy, national security, competition concerns
Approval granted; investment can proceed
Sectors:
Defense
Telecom beyond 49%
Insurance beyond 49%
Multi-brand retail (beyond prescribed limits)
Print/media (news and current affairs)
Key Requirement: Comply with sectoral FDI limits, conditions, and reporting requirements after approval.
3. Compliance Requirements for FDI
Post-Investment Compliance under FEMA / RBI:
| Compliance | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Reporting | FC-GPR (for fresh issue of shares) / FC-TRS (transfer of shares) to RBI within 30 days |
| Valuation | Share issuance/transfer must comply with SEBI/FEMA pricing guidelines |
| Board Approval | Indian company’s board must approve foreign investment and allot shares |
| Annual Reporting | Submission in Annual Return on Foreign Liabilities and Assets (FLA Return) |
| Downstream Investment | Indian subsidiary of foreign investor must adhere to sectoral caps |
Additional Conditions (sector-specific):
Minimum capital requirements (e.g., single-brand retail: US$ 100 million)
Local sourcing obligations
Prohibition on certain activities (e.g., FDI in real estate for trading purposes, lottery business)
4. Judicial Interpretation / Case Laws
Case 1: Vodafone International Holdings B.V. v. Union of India (2012)
Facts: FDI via indirect share acquisition in telecom sector; RBI approval and pricing compliance disputed.
Held: RBI approval required for indirect FDI in sectors beyond automatic limits.
Principle: Indirect FDI also falls under automatic or government route and must comply with reporting.
Case 2: Cairn Energy India Holdings Ltd. v. Union of India (2013)
Facts: Downstream investment and sectoral limit compliance.
Held: Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies must adhere to FDI caps.
Principle: Downstream investment restrictions under FEMA are enforceable.
Case 3: Reliance Industries Ltd. v. RBI (2015)
Facts: Reporting of FDI inflows under automatic route delayed.
Held: Timely reporting mandatory; late filings attract penalties.
Principle: Procedural compliance is essential even under automatic route.
Case 4: Essar Projects Ltd. v. Union of India (2014)
Facts: FDI in infrastructure project required prior approval.
Held: Government route mandatory for sectors beyond automatic limits.
Principle: Sectoral limits enforceable; prior approval required for approval-route sectors.
Case 5: Tata Sons Ltd. v. SEBI & RBI (2016)
Facts: Indirect FDI via holding companies; compliance with FDI caps disputed.
Held: Indirect shareholding considered for sectoral caps; RBI compliance required.
Principle: FDI caps include indirect ownership; reporting and approvals mandatory.
Case 6: Cairn India Ltd. v. Union of India (2017)
Facts: FDI in oil & gas; dispute over government approval and downstream investment.
Held: RBI and government approvals must be obtained; failure renders investment unenforceable.
Principle: Government route approval critical for strategic sectors beyond automatic route.
5. Key Principles Summarized
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Automatic vs Government Route | Automatic: no prior approval, reporting mandatory; Government: prior approval required |
| Sectoral FDI Caps | Each sector has maximum permissible foreign investment (equity % limits) |
| Reporting Compliance | Form FC-GPR / FC-TRS within 30 days; FLA return annually |
| Downstream Investment | Indian subsidiaries must adhere to sectoral caps and approval conditions |
| Indirect FDI | Indirect ownership counts for compliance with FDI limits |
| Penalties for Non-Compliance | Excess FDI or non-reporting can lead to penalties, divestment, or nullification |
Conclusion:
FDI approval routes and compliance are sector-dependent and legally enforceable under FEMA. Courts consistently uphold sectoral caps, automatic vs government routes, and reporting obligations. A well-structured FDI transaction requires alignment with FDI policy, RBI reporting, and corporate approvals to avoid disputes.
RELATED Blog
comments