Disputes Over Logistics And Freight-Forwarding Service Agreements
1. Meaning of Logistics and Freight-Forwarding Service Agreements
Logistics and freight-forwarding service agreements govern the transport, storage, consolidation, and delivery of goods across domestic and international supply chains. A freight forwarder typically acts as:
An agent arranging carriage on behalf of the shipper, or
A principal providing carriage under its own bill of lading (NVOCC)
These agreements are central to import–export contracts, multimodal transport, warehousing, and supply-chain outsourcing.
2. Common Causes of Disputes
Loss, Damage, or Delay of Goods
Incorrect Documentation – Bills of lading, customs papers, invoices
Misrepresentation of Carrier Role – Agent vs principal liability
Deviation and Unauthorized Routing
Failure to Obtain Insurance
Demurrage, Detention, and Storage Charge Disputes
3. Legal Issues Typically Raised
Standard of care owed by freight forwarders
Applicability of international conventions (Hague-Visby, CMR, Montreal)
Limitation of liability clauses
Agency versus contractual carrier liability
Jurisdiction and governing law clauses
Burden of proof for loss or delay
4. Remedies Commonly Sought
Compensation for loss or damage to cargo
Consequential damages for delay
Indemnity claims between forwarders and carriers
Declaratory relief on liability allocation
Injunctions against wrongful lien or detention
5. Key Case Laws on Logistics and Freight-Forwarding Disputes
1. Pyrene Co Ltd v Scindia Steam Navigation Co Ltd (UK)
Issue: When carrier liability attaches for damaged goods
Held: Liability arose before loading under contractual arrangements.
Principle: Carrier obligations may begin prior to physical shipment.
2. Morris v C W Martin & Sons Ltd (UK)
Issue: Liability of bailees for loss of goods
Held: Bailee strictly liable for loss caused by subcontractors.
Principle: Freight forwarders owe non-delegable duties as bailees.
3. The Starsin (Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Private Ltd) (UK)
Issue: Whether carrier was agent or principal under bill of lading
Held: Charterer treated as contractual carrier.
Principle: Substance of documentation overrides boilerplate clauses.
4. The Rafaela S (UK)
Issue: Status of straight bill of lading
Held: Straight bills qualify as bills of lading.
Principle: Documentation form affects rights of suit and liability.
5. Sompo Japan Insurance Co v Union Pacific Railroad Co (USA)
Issue: Multimodal transport liability limitations
Held: Carrier could rely on contractual liability limits.
Principle: Through-transport clauses can extend limitation regimes.
6. Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield (UK)
Issue: Forwarder’s authority in handling undelivered goods
Held: Forwarder acted reasonably in safeguarding goods.
Principle: Forwarders have implied authority to protect cargo interests.
7. Mediterranean Shipping Co SA v Cottonex Anstalt (UK)
Issue: Indefinite detention and demurrage charges
Held: Contract frustrated after prolonged detention.
Principle: Demurrage obligations are not unlimited.
6. Contractual Clauses That Determine Outcomes
Scope of services and carrier role
Limitation of liability and Himalaya clauses
Insurance and risk-transfer provisions
Demurrage and detention clauses
Jurisdiction, arbitration, and governing law clauses
Force majeure and deviation clauses
7. Risk-Mitigation Best Practices
Clearly define forwarder’s role (agent vs principal)
Ensure accurate and complete transport documentation
Align liability limits with cargo value
Obtain appropriate cargo insurance
Define demurrage and detention caps
8. Conclusion
Disputes over logistics and freight-forwarding service agreements arise from the complex interplay of contract law, bailment principles, and international transport conventions. Courts focus on contractual role clarity, documentation accuracy, and reasonable care standards. Well-drafted agreements and disciplined operational practices are key to minimizing costly supply-chain disputes.
RELATED Blog
comments