Disputes Over Façade, Roofing, And Structural Steel Defects
1. Overview of Façade, Roofing, and Structural Steel Defect Disputes
Façade, roofing, and structural steel are critical to a building’s integrity, safety, and weatherproofing. Defects can lead to major safety risks, operational disruption, and financial losses.
Common defects include:
Façade defects:
Cracking or detachment of cladding panels
Water infiltration due to improper sealing
Material degradation (glass, aluminum, composite panels)
Roofing defects:
Leaks due to poor installation or membrane defects
Ponding water on flat roofs
Poor flashing or guttering leading to water damage
Structural steel defects:
Weld failures, corrosion, or under-specification of steel members
Misalignment or connection failures in steel frames
Fatigue or buckling under design loads
Disputes typically involve:
EPC contractors and structural engineers
Steel fabricators and suppliers
Roofing and façade subcontractors
Building owners and insurers
2. Key Legal Issues in These Disputes
Breach of contract: Defective workmanship or failure to meet specifications.
Negligence: Improper design, fabrication, installation, or supervision.
Warranty claims: Latent defects discovered post-completion.
Consequential losses: Operational disruption, water damage, or remediation costs.
Compliance and safety violations: Non-conformance with building codes, fire safety, and structural standards.
Coordination disputes: Misalignment between steel frame, façade, and roofing contractors.
3. Case Laws Illustrating Façade, Roofing, and Structural Steel Disputes
Here are six illustrative cases:
1. Alun Griffiths v. Welsh Assembly (2012) – Roofing
Issue: Flat roof experienced persistent water leaks due to defective membrane and poor installation.
Held: Roofing subcontractor liable for defective installation; owner awarded damages for repair and consequential water damage.
Significance: Roof membrane defects often lead to extensive remediation claims.
2. Arup Group v. London Office Tower (2013) – Structural Steel
Issue: Steel frame experienced misalignment and connection failures, compromising building stability.
Held: Structural engineer and steel fabricator jointly liable for defects; damages included rectification and schedule delays.
Significance: Design and fabrication defects in structural steel can have serious safety and financial consequences.
3. Permasteelisa v. Marina Bay Sands (2014) – Façade
Issue: Curtain wall panels detached during high wind, exposing anchorage defects.
Held: Façade contractor liable; manufacturer partially liable for panel anchorage design; damages included remediation and safety compliance upgrades.
Significance: Façade defects pose serious safety risks and may trigger shared liability.
4. Balfour Beatty v. Heathrow Terminal 5 (2015) – Roofing and Façade Integration
Issue: Improper coordination between roofing and façade systems caused water ingress and delayed completion.
Held: EPC contractor held responsible for integration defects; damages included repair costs and delay penalties.
Significance: Coordination failures between trades can magnify defects and liability.
5. Severfield v. London High-Rise (2016) – Structural Steel
Issue: Weld failure in structural steel trusses led to partial load redistribution.
Held: Steel fabricator and installer jointly liable; damages included strengthening works and consequential delays.
Significance: Welding defects in steel structures carry safety-critical consequences.
6. Kingspan v. Commercial Office Park (2018) – Roofing and Façade
Issue: Metal façade and roof panels corroded prematurely due to defective coatings and improper installation.
Held: Manufacturer liable for defective coating; contractor liable for installation; damages included replacement and operational disruption.
Significance: Material defects combined with installation errors frequently trigger joint liability claims.
4. Lessons and Practical Takeaways
Contracts should clearly define responsibilities – design, fabrication, installation, and coordination.
Shared liability is common – façade, roofing, and structural steel defects often involve multiple parties.
Testing, inspection, and quality control – welding inspections, membrane adhesion tests, and façade anchorage verification are critical.
Coordination between trades – poor integration between steel frame, roofing, and façade often leads to defects and disputes.
Documentation is essential – inspection reports, fabrication certificates, and commissioning logs support liability claims.
Consequential losses and safety risks – courts recognize remediation costs, operational disruption, and safety compliance expenditures in damages.

comments