Disputes Over Breaches Of Consultancy, Advisory, And Corporate Agreements
I. Introduction
Consultancy, advisory, and corporate agreements play a vital role in modern commercial transactions. These contracts typically involve the provision of specialized professional services, strategic advice, or management support in areas such as finance, mergers and acquisitions, governance, compliance, technology, and business restructuring.
Disputes arise when one party alleges that the other has failed to perform contractual obligations, provided negligent or misleading advice, breached fiduciary duties, or violated confidentiality and non-compete clauses.
II. Nature of Consultancy, Advisory, and Corporate Agreements
1. Consultancy Agreements
These involve expert services rendered by consultants, such as:
Management consultants
IT and technical consultants
Financial and tax consultants
Key obligations include:
Exercise of reasonable skill and care
Compliance with agreed scope of work
Confidentiality and conflict-of-interest duties
2. Advisory Agreements
Advisory contracts often involve:
Investment banking advisors
Legal and financial advisors
Strategic and M&A advisors
Such agreements may impose:
Fiduciary duties
Disclosure obligations
Duties to avoid misleading advice
3. Corporate Agreements
These include:
Shareholders’ agreements
Joint venture agreements
Management and service agreements
They regulate control, governance, profit sharing, and exit mechanisms.
III. Common Grounds for Disputes
Breach of contractual duties
Negligent or erroneous professional advice
Misrepresentation and non-disclosure
Breach of fiduciary duty
Violation of confidentiality or non-compete clauses
Improper termination of consultancy or advisory contracts
IV. Case Laws on Breaches of Consultancy, Advisory, and Corporate Agreements
1. Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v. Heller & Partners Ltd (UK House of Lords)
Facts:
An advertising firm relied on financial advice given by bankers regarding a client’s creditworthiness.
Legal Issue:
Whether negligent advice could give rise to liability absent a formal contract.
Held:
The court recognized liability for negligent misstatement where a special relationship exists.
Significance:
Foundational case for advisory liability
Frequently cited in consultancy and advisory disputes
2. Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman (UK House of Lords)
Facts:
Investors relied on auditors’ reports when acquiring shares.
Legal Issue:
Scope of duty of care owed by professional advisors.
Held:
The auditors owed no duty to potential investors for takeover decisions.
Significance:
Defined limits of advisory liability
Introduced the three-fold test for duty of care
3. Morgan Crucible Co plc v. Hill Samuel Bank Ltd (UK Court of Appeal)
Facts:
A financial advisor provided advice during a takeover bid while having conflicting interests.
Legal Issue:
Breach of fiduciary duty by an advisor.
Held:
The advisor was held liable for failing to disclose conflicts of interest.
Significance:
Reinforced fiduciary obligations in advisory relationships
Applied widely to corporate advisory contracts
4. Anns v. Merton London Borough Council (UK House of Lords)
Facts:
Although not purely corporate, the case addressed negligent professional services.
Legal Issue:
Extent of liability for professional negligence.
Held:
Recognized a broad duty of care for professionals.
Significance:
Influenced early consultancy negligence claims
Later refined but still doctrinally relevant
5. Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd (India)
Facts:
Dispute concerned corporate governance and contractual arrangements involving advisory control.
Legal Issue:
Interference with corporate decision-making and contractual obligations.
Held:
The Supreme Court emphasized respect for corporate agreements and governance norms.
Significance:
Landmark Indian corporate law case
Relevant for breaches of corporate and advisory arrangements
6. Tata Consultancy Services v. State of Andhra Pradesh (India)
Facts:
The dispute arose out of contractual obligations relating to consultancy and services.
Legal Issue:
Nature of consultancy services and contractual interpretation.
Held:
The court recognized consultancy as a professional service governed by contract terms.
Significance:
Clarified legal status of consultancy agreements
Applied in service-related breach disputes
7. V.B. Rangaraj v. V.B. Gopalakrishnan (India)
Facts:
Dispute arose over restrictions imposed under a shareholders’ agreement.
Legal Issue:
Enforceability of corporate agreements vis-à-vis company law.
Held:
Shareholder agreements must align with the company’s articles.
Significance:
Key authority on corporate agreement breaches
Widely cited in joint venture and shareholder disputes
V. Remedies Available in Such Disputes
Damages for financial loss caused by breach
Rescission for misrepresentation or fraud
Specific performance in corporate agreements
Injunctions to restrain misuse of confidential information
Termination of agreements for fundamental breach
VI. Conclusion
Disputes over breaches of consultancy, advisory, and corporate agreements reflect the growing reliance on professional expertise and strategic advice in commercial transactions. Courts balance:
Contractual terms
Professional standards of care
Fiduciary obligations
The case laws demonstrate that while advisors are not guarantors of success, they are legally accountable for negligence, conflicts of interest, and contractual breaches.
RELATED Blog
comments