Customs International Law Blogs
Customs in International Law
1. Meaning of Custom in International Law
Custom refers to a practice or behavior that is repeated consistently by states and is accepted by them as legally binding.
It is one of the primary sources of international law, alongside treaties and general principles.
Customary international law arises from:
State practice (usus): Actual behavior or consistent actions of states.
Opinio Juris: The belief that such practice is carried out of a sense of legal obligation.
2. Elements of Customary International Law
(a) State Practice (Usus)
The practice must be general and consistent among states.
It can include diplomatic acts, official statements, legislation, judicial decisions, or military conduct.
The practice need not be universal but should be widespread and representative.
(b) Opinio Juris sive necessitatis
States must follow the practice because they believe it is legally obligatory, not merely out of habit or courtesy.
This distinguishes legal customs from mere usage or habits.
3. Importance of Customary International Law
Fills gaps where no treaty exists.
Binds all states, including those that have not expressly consented, unless they are persistent objectors.
Custom is dynamic and evolves with changing state practice and legal views.
4. Examples of Customary International Law
Prohibition of genocide.
Principle of non-intervention in the domestic affairs of states.
Diplomatic immunity.
Rules governing the high seas.
Immunity of heads of state.
5. Relationship Between Treaties and Customs
Treaties codify and confirm existing customs or create new legal rules.
Custom may develop independently of treaties.
Treaties and customs can coexist; sometimes treaty provisions reflect customary norms.
6. Case Laws Illustrating Customs in International Law
(a) North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (1969) - ICJ
Issue: Whether a treaty rule could be considered customary international law binding on non-parties.
Ruling: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) explained the importance of widespread and representative state practice accompanied by opinio juris to establish a customary rule.
The Court stressed that customs must be consistent and general to qualify as binding customary law.
(b) Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru) (1950) - ICJ
Issue: Whether the practice of granting diplomatic asylum was a customary rule binding on both parties.
Ruling: The Court found no general customary rule on diplomatic asylum because the state practice was inconsistent and opinio juris was lacking in the relevant region.
This case underlines the need for uniform state practice and legal obligation.
(c) Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v. Albania) (1949) - ICJ
Issue: Whether Albania violated international law by laying mines in its territorial waters.
Ruling: The ICJ emphasized that states are bound by customary international law even if no treaty explicitly prohibits an act.
This affirmed the binding force of customary international law.
7. Acquisition of Customary International Law
Custom develops gradually through continuous state practice.
Can be accelerated in urgent cases (e.g., humanitarian law).
Some customs have universal acceptance, others regional or limited scope.
8. Persistent Objector Rule
A state that consistently objects to an emerging custom from the outset may not be bound by that custom.
This protects state sovereignty but is subject to limits (cannot object to peremptory norms like prohibition of genocide).
9. Peremptory Norms (Jus Cogens) and Custom
Certain fundamental principles of international law, like prohibition of torture or slavery, are peremptory norms that override conflicting customs or treaties.
These norms reflect the highest level of customary international law.
10. Summary
| Element | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Custom | Practice accepted as law by states (state practice + opinio juris) |
| Sources | State behavior, official acts, treaties, judicial decisions |
| Binding nature | Binding on all states except persistent objectors |
| Role | Complements treaties, fills legal gaps |
| Important cases | North Sea Continental Shelf, Asylum, Corfu Channel |
RELATED Blog
0 comments