Court Assistance For Interim Relief In Bahrain
1. Legal Framework in Bahrain
(a) Bahrain Arbitration Law
- Legislative Decree No. 9 of 2015
- Based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
(b) Key Provision
- Article 9 → Allows parties to request interim measures from courts before or during arbitration
2. Concept of Court Assistance
Definition:
Court assistance for interim relief means:
National courts grant temporary protective measures to support arbitration proceedings.
3. Types of Interim Relief by Bahraini Courts
Courts in Bahrain may grant:
(1) Asset Preservation Orders
- Freezing bank accounts
- Preventing asset dissipation
(2) Injunctions
- Restraining certain actions
(3) Evidence Preservation
- Securing documents or testimony
(4) Security for Costs
- Protecting respondent’s financial position
4. When Can Courts Grant Interim Relief?
(A) Before Constitution of Tribunal
- When urgent relief is required
(B) During Arbitration
- When tribunal lacks enforcement power
(C) After Award (Limited Cases)
- To protect enforcement rights
5. Relationship Between Courts and Tribunals
(A) Concurrent Jurisdiction
- Both courts and tribunals can grant interim measures
(B) Complementary Roles
- Courts:
- Provide enforceability
- Tribunals:
- Provide procedural control
6. Conditions for Granting Interim Relief
Bahraini courts generally follow internationally recognized standards:
(1) Prima Facie Case
(2) Urgency
(3) Risk of Irreparable Harm
(4) Balance of Convenience
7. Judicial Approach in Bahrain
Bahraini courts:
- Are arbitration-friendly
- Do not treat court applications as:
- Waiver of arbitration agreement
- Aim to:
- Preserve effectiveness of arbitration
8. Enforcement of Interim Orders
Court-ordered interim measures are:
- Directly enforceable within Bahrain
- Backed by state coercive power
This gives courts an advantage over tribunals in enforcement.
9. Key Case Laws (International & Persuasive)
Due to limited published Bahraini decisions, courts rely on international precedents.
1. Channel Tunnel Group Ltd v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd
Principle:
- Courts may grant interim relief despite arbitration agreement
Relevance:
- Confirms compatibility of court assistance with arbitration
2. American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd
Principle:
- Established test for granting interim injunctions
Relevance:
- Applied globally, including in arbitration contexts
3. Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd
Principle:
- Courts retain power to grant interim relief even when arbitration is agreed
Relevance:
- Supports Bahrain’s concurrent jurisdiction model
4. Mobil Cerro Negro Ltd v Petroleos de Venezuela SA
Principle:
- Courts enforce interim measures supporting arbitration
Relevance:
- Demonstrates enforcement role of courts
5. Front Carriers Ltd v Atlantic and Orient Shipping Corp
Principle:
- Courts assist arbitration by preserving assets
Relevance:
- Reflects supportive judicial approach
6. Siskina (Owners of Cargo Lately Laden on Board) v Distos Compania Naviera SA
Principle:
- Interim relief must be tied to a substantive claim
Relevance:
- Influences limits on court powers
10. Practical Scenarios
Scenario 1:
- Urgent asset dissipation risk before tribunal formed
✔ Party approaches court
Scenario 2:
- Tribunal orders interim measure but lacks enforcement power
✔ Court enforces or reissues order
Scenario 3:
- Evidence at risk of destruction
✔ Court intervenes to preserve evidence
11. Limitations on Court Powers
(A) Non-Interference Principle
- Courts avoid interfering with merits of dispute
(B) Respect for Arbitration Agreement
- Courts do not replace tribunal role
(C) Territorial Limits
- Orders enforceable primarily within Bahrain
12. Drafting Recommendations
To ensure effective interim relief:
(1) Include Clause:
- Allow recourse to courts for interim measures
(2) Provide for Emergency Arbitration
- Through institutional rules
(3) Specify Seat
- Ensures clarity on court jurisdiction
13. Advantages of Court Assistance
- Strong enforcement powers
- Immediate relief in urgent situations
- Protection of arbitration effectiveness
14. Conclusion
In Bahrain:
- Courts play a supportive and complementary role in arbitration
- Interim relief is available:
- Before
- During
- (Limited) after arbitration
The Bahraini system ensures that arbitration is effective and enforceable, combining:
- Tribunal autonomy
- Judicial support
This balance makes Bahrain a reliable and arbitration-friendly jurisdiction.
RELATED Blog
comments