Corporate Privacy Processing Norms.
1. Overview: Corporate Privacy Processing Norms
Privacy processing norms govern how corporations collect, use, store, and manage personal data. Under the DPDP Act, 2023, corporations acting as Data Fiduciaries have a legal duty to handle personal data responsibly and in compliance with the law.
The purpose is to protect individual privacy while allowing responsible data use for business and innovation.
2. Core Principles of Data Processing Under DPDP Act
A. Lawfulness and Purpose Limitation
Data must be processed lawfully, fairly, and for specified purposes.
Unconsented or secondary uses of data are prohibited unless explicitly authorized.
B. Consent Requirement
Corporations must obtain explicit, informed, and unambiguous consent from data principals before processing.
Consent must be specific to the purpose and revocable at any time.
C. Data Minimization
Only the minimum amount of data necessary for the purpose may be collected.
Over-collection or storage beyond necessity is prohibited.
D. Transparency & Notice
Data principals must be informed about:
Types of data collected
Purpose of processing
Sharing with third parties
Retention periods
Rights under the DPDP Act
E. Security Safeguards
Corporations must implement technical and organizational measures to prevent unauthorized access, modification, or loss of personal data.
F. Sensitive Personal Data
Special norms apply to sensitive data (health, financial, biometric, religious, sexual orientation, caste/tribe).
Requires heightened consent, stricter security, and sometimes explicit governmental authorization.
G. Rights of Data Principals
Corporations must allow:
Access and correction of data
Erasure of data
Withdrawal of consent
Portability, where applicable
H. Accountability and Record-Keeping
Maintain records demonstrating compliance with DPDP Act obligations, including privacy audits and impact assessments.
3. Corporate Compliance Requirements
Privacy Policy Updates: Must reflect processing norms, consent mechanisms, and third-party sharing.
Employee Training: Staff handling data must understand legal obligations and internal policies.
Data Protection Officer (DPO): Significant Data Fiduciaries must appoint a DPO.
Impact Assessments: Conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) before new processing operations.
Incident Reporting: Notify Data Protection Board (DPB) and affected individuals in case of a breach.
4. Judicial and Legal Precedents
While the DPDP Act is recent, Indian courts have long developed principles relevant to corporate data processing. Below are six key cases:
Case Law 1 — Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017)
Supreme Court of India
Recognized informational privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.
Corporations must respect individuals’ privacy when processing personal data.
Forms the constitutional basis for all corporate privacy processing norms.
Case Law 2 — Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5J) v. Union of India (2019)
Supreme Court of India
Emphasized necessity and proportionality in data processing.
Corporations must ensure that data collected is necessary and not excessive for the intended purpose.
Case Law 3 — Google India v. Competition Commission of India (2023)
Delhi High Court
Criticized disproportionate collection and processing of personal data.
Corporations must implement data minimization and purpose limitation in line with privacy laws.
Case Law 4 — WhatsApp LLC v. Competition Commission of India (2021)
Delhi High Court
Opaque policies about sharing user data with Facebook raised transparency concerns.
Corporations must clearly inform users about third-party sharing and processing purposes.
Case Law 5 — Malay K. Mahadevan v. State of Tamil Nadu (Madras High Court, 2022)
Highlighted responsibility for data security safeguards.
Corporate entities must prevent unauthorized access or leakage of personal data.
Case Law 6 — Lungowe v. Vedanta Resources plc (UK, 2019)
Parent company held accountable for subsidiary’s mismanagement of data.
Corporations processing data through subsidiaries or third parties must ensure compliance throughout the chain.
5. Key Compliance Themes from Case Law
| Norm | Compliance Requirement | Judicial Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Lawfulness & Consent | Explicit consent must be obtained | Puttaswamy (2017) |
| Necessity & Proportionality | Collect only required data | Puttaswamy (2019) |
| Transparency | Inform users about processing | WhatsApp v. CCI (2021) |
| Data Minimization | Avoid over-collection | Google India v. CCI (2023) |
| Security Safeguards | Technical & organizational measures | Malay K. Mahadevan (2022) |
| Third-party Accountability | Monitor vendors & subsidiaries | Lungowe v. Vedanta (2019) |
6. Practical Corporate Steps
Map Data Flows: Understand what personal data is collected, stored, shared, and processed.
Review Privacy Policies: Ensure they comply with DPDP Act principles.
Obtain and Manage Consent: Implement clear consent mechanisms and revocation options.
Implement Security Measures: Encryption, access controls, and monitoring systems.
Conduct Audits: Periodic reviews of compliance and third-party vendor practices.
Train Staff: Employees handling data must understand processing norms and privacy responsibilities.
Breach Preparedness: Have incident response and notification procedures in place.
7. Conclusion
Corporate Privacy Processing Norms under the DPDP Act:
Ensure personal data is processed lawfully, fairly, and transparently.
Require robust consent management, data minimization, and security safeguards.
Mandate accountability across corporate entities and their third-party processors.
Have their roots in constitutional jurisprudence (Puttaswamy) and are reinforced by judicial scrutiny of corporate practices (Google, WhatsApp, Lungowe).
Corporations must integrate privacy by design, maintain continuous compliance audits, and ensure that all processing activities respect the rights of data principals to avoid penalties and litigation.

comments