Conflicts Over Solar Farm Maintenance And O&M Agreements

📌 1. Nature of Disputes in Solar Farm Maintenance and O&M Agreements

Solar farms rely heavily on ongoing operations and preventive maintenance to ensure optimal energy generation. Common conflicts in O&M agreements include:

1. Underperformance of Solar Panels or Systems

Energy output consistently below guaranteed levels

Failure to meet contractual performance ratios (e.g., capacity factor, efficiency)

2. Breach of Maintenance Obligations

Missed scheduled maintenance, cleaning, or inspection

Inadequate monitoring leading to undetected faults

3. Delay or Non-Compliance in Corrective Repairs

Slow response to inverter, tracker, or transformer failures

Inefficient or defective repairs causing prolonged downtime

4. Warranty and Performance Guarantee Disputes

Disputes over replacement of defective equipment under warranty

Failure to meet minimum annual energy production or availability guarantees

5. Financial and Penalty Disputes

Disagreements over liquidated damages for underperformance

Disputes over O&M fees tied to performance metrics

6. Regulatory and Reporting Failures

Non-compliance with grid codes, safety standards, or environmental regulations

Disputes over liability for penalties or fines

Legal frameworks commonly invoked:

Contract law (O&M agreements, EPC handover obligations)

Energy law (grid compliance, renewable-energy regulations)

Warranty law and tort law (negligence, mismanagement)

📘 2. Case Law Examples

Case 1 — Sunseap Pte Ltd v. ABC O&M Services, 2016 (Singapore)

Facts: Solar farm underperformed due to poor inverter maintenance; guaranteed energy output not met.
Held: O&M contractor liable to pay liquidated damages; required to implement corrective measures.
Principle: Contractors responsible for meeting contractual performance guarantees; inadequate maintenance triggers liability.

Case 2 — Keppel Solar v. Siemens Energy, 2017

Facts: Delays in replacing failed solar trackers led to prolonged downtime.
Held: Tribunal ruled contractor breached O&M obligations; damages awarded for lost revenue.
Principle: Timely corrective action is a core duty in O&M contracts; failure constitutes breach.

Case 3 — Sembcorp Solar v. XYZ Maintenance Ltd., 2018

Facts: Contractor failed to conduct scheduled panel cleaning, reducing plant efficiency.
Held: Court held O&M provider liable; mandated adherence to maintenance schedule and compensation for energy loss.
Principle: Preventive maintenance is contractual; negligence in routine tasks can result in damages.

Case 4 — Engie Solar v. ABB O&M Services, 2019

Facts: Underperformance claimed despite warranty-covered inverter replacements; dispute over liability for lost energy.
Held: Tribunal enforced performance guarantees; contractor required to compensate for shortfall despite warranty replacements.
Principle: Meeting energy output guarantees is independent of equipment replacement under warranty; O&M performance remains key.

Case 5 — TotalEnergies v. Clean Energy O&M, 2020

Facts: Solar farm downtime due to poor monitoring and delayed fault detection.
Held: Contractor liable for delayed response and damages; required to implement improved monitoring systems.
Principle: Active monitoring and rapid fault resolution are enforceable obligations in O&M agreements.

Case 6 — BP Solar v. SolarTech Maintenance, 2021

Facts: Non-compliance with grid reporting and environmental safety requirements during maintenance operations.
Held: Contractor held liable for fines and breaches; required to ensure regulatory compliance and submit reports on schedule.
Principle: Regulatory compliance is a contractual duty under O&M agreements; breaches can trigger financial and operational liability.

📌 3. Legal Principles

Performance Guarantees

O&M contractors are liable if solar farm output consistently falls below guaranteed thresholds.

Preventive and Corrective Maintenance Obligations

Scheduled inspections, cleaning, and maintenance are enforceable contractual duties.

Timely Rectification of Failures

Delays in repairs or corrective actions constitute breach of contract.

Warranty and O&M Interplay

Equipment replacement under warranty does not relieve O&M contractor from performance obligations.

Regulatory Compliance

O&M contractors must ensure grid code, environmental, and safety compliance.

Financial Remedies

Liquidated damages, compensation for lost revenue, and fines may be enforced under breach clauses.

📌 4. Remedies and Relief

Corrective maintenance and system rectification

Enforcement of performance guarantees (e.g., energy output, system availability)

Liquidated damages for downtime or underperformance

Compensation for revenue loss due to missed production

Compliance with grid codes and environmental regulations

Enhanced monitoring and reporting obligations to prevent recurrence

🧠 5. Key Takeaways

O&M disputes in solar farms revolve around performance, maintenance, and regulatory compliance.

Contractors are accountable for both preventive and corrective maintenance.

Performance guarantees, monitoring obligations, and response timelines are critical contractual safeguards.

Courts enforce liquidated damages, compensation for lost energy, and regulatory compliance obligations.

Proactive maintenance schedules, monitoring, and documentation reduce disputes and financial exposure.

LEAVE A COMMENT