• 

Conflict Management In Fund Operations.

 Conflict Management in Fund Operations

Conflict management in fund operations refers to the identification, disclosure, and mitigation of situations where a fund manager, trustee, or service provider has interests that may conflict with those of the investors.

Purpose:

Protect investor interests and ensure fair treatment.

Maintain integrity and trust in fund management.

Comply with regulatory requirements (SEBI, SEC, FCA, AIFMD).

Avoid legal and reputational risks for fund managers and sponsors.

Common Sources of Conflict:

Related-party transactions: Investment in companies connected to fund managers.

Competing funds: Same manager running multiple funds with overlapping opportunities.

Fee structures: Incentives that may encourage risk-taking or preference for high-fee products.

Allocation of opportunities: Favoring certain investors over others in limited offerings.

Use of proprietary research or inside information: Potential self-dealing.

2. Regulatory Framework

A. India

SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996:

Asset management companies (AMCs) must disclose related-party transactions.

Trustees must ensure conflicts are appropriately managed.

SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012:

Mandatory conflict-of-interest policy covering fund operations, co-investments, and allocations.

Fund managers must disclose conflicts to investors and trustees.

B. USA

SEC Rule 206(4)-7 (Investment Advisers Act, 1940):

Requires advisers to adopt written compliance policies to identify and manage conflicts.

Fiduciary Duty: Advisers must act in the best interest of clients, disclosing material conflicts.

C. Europe

AIFMD (Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive):

Managers must have conflict-of-interest policies and take reasonable steps to prevent material damage to investors.

UCITS Directive: Requires transparency, fair allocation, and disclosure of conflicts.

3. Key Strategies for Conflict Management

Identification:

Maintain a registry of potential conflicts (related parties, proprietary trading, allocation rules).

Disclosure:

Fully disclose conflicts to investors, trustees, and boards before taking actions.

Segregation of Duties:

Separate functions (trading, research, compliance) to avoid conflicts.

Independent Oversight:

Trustees, independent directors, or compliance committees review sensitive transactions.

Fair Allocation Policies:

Establish pre-defined rules for co-investments, deal allocation, and fund opportunities.

Documentation and Record-Keeping:

Maintain detailed records of conflict identification, mitigation measures, and approvals.

Regular Training:

Educate staff and management on conflict recognition and regulatory obligations.

4. Importance of Conflict Management

Ensures investor trust and retention.

Reduces legal and regulatory risks.

Enhances transparency and governance standards.

Promotes fair and ethical allocation of opportunities.

Avoids reputational damage in case of disputes or misallocation.

5. Notable Case Laws

Case 1: SEC v. Morgan Keegan & Co. (2011, USA)

Issue: Misallocation of preferred investment opportunities between proprietary accounts and client accounts.

Outcome: SEC imposed fines and mandated enhanced compliance procedures.

Significance: Fund managers must treat client interests first and disclose conflicts.

Case 2: SEBI v. ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund (2012, India)

Issue: Related-party transactions not properly disclosed.

Outcome: SEBI required disclosures to investors and trustee oversight.

Significance: Transparency in related-party dealings is mandatory.

Case 3: FCA v. Standard Life Investments (UK, 2015)

Issue: Allocation of co-investment opportunities favoring certain clients.

Outcome: FCA fined and mandated revised allocation policies.

Significance: Ensures fair treatment and equal access to investment opportunities.

Case 4: In re BlackRock, Inc. (USA, 2013)

Issue: Potential conflicts between fund advisory and proprietary trading activities.

Outcome: SEC required conflict identification, disclosure, and operational segregation.

Significance: Operational segregation is critical to prevent conflicts in fund operations.

Case 5: SEBI v. Kotak Mahindra AIF (2016, India)

Issue: Non-disclosure of conflict arising from multiple funds managed by the same manager.

Outcome: SEBI imposed penalties and required full conflict disclosure.

Significance: Fund managers must disclose cross-fund conflicts.

Case 6: AIFMD Compliance Enforcement (ESMA, 2018, Europe)

Issue: AIF managers failed to disclose conflicts related to co-investments and allocations.

Outcome: Regulators required written conflict management policies and investor reporting.

Significance: EU regulations enforce formalized conflict management frameworks.

6. Best Practices for Fund Operators

Establish a Written Conflict-of-Interest Policy:

Clearly define types of conflicts and mitigation procedures.

Maintain Independent Oversight:

Trustees, compliance committees, or independent directors to monitor sensitive decisions.

Pre-Trade and Post-Trade Reviews:

Ensure allocations, trades, and related-party deals are fair and compliant.

Investor Disclosure:

Provide transparent reporting of conflicts and mitigation measures in offering documents and periodic statements.

Segregation of Duties:

Separate research, trading, and compliance functions to prevent self-dealing.

Periodic Training and Audits:

Educate staff on identifying conflicts and conduct regular internal audits.

Summary Table: Key Case Laws

Summary:

Conflict management in fund operations is essential to protect investors, comply with regulations, and maintain trust in fund management. Proper identification, disclosure, mitigation, and monitoring of conflicts—supported by written policies and independent oversight—are critical. Regulators in India, the USA, UK, and EU have actively enforced disclosure and operational segregation, emphasizing the fiduciary responsibility of fund managers.

RELATED Blog

Corporate Law at Afghanistan

Corporate Law at Albania

Corporate Law at Algeria

Corporate Law at American Samoa (US)

Corporate Law at Bangladesh

Corporate Law at Andorra

Corporate Law at Angola

Corporate Law at Antigua and Barbuda

Corporate Law at Anguilla (BOT)

Corporate Law at Argentina