• 

Clawback And Malus Provisions.

1. Introduction

Clawback and Malus provisions are mechanisms incorporated in executive remuneration frameworks to recover or adjust previously granted incentives in certain circumstances.

Definitions:

Clawback: The right of a company to recover bonuses, stock options, or other incentives from executives after they have been paid, usually due to misconduct, fraud, financial restatement, or violation of policies.

Malus: The right to reduce unvested or pending incentive payouts before they are actually paid or vested, in case of poor performance or risk-adjusted breaches.

Purpose:

Ensure accountability and responsible risk-taking

Protect shareholders and company interests

Discourage fraudulent or negligent behavior

Align executive pay with long-term performance and compliance

📌 2. Statutory and Regulatory Framework in India

A. Companies Act, 2013

Section 197: Directors’ and KMP remuneration must be justified and disclosed

Schedule V: Conditions for managerial remuneration in case of loss; prevents unjust enrichment

Section 134: Board report must disclose remuneration policy, including incentive adjustments

B. SEBI Regulations (for listed companies)

SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015

Clause 19 & 36: Remuneration policy must specify conditions under which clawback and malus can be applied

Ensures disclosure of incentive recovery or reduction provisions

SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2021

ESOP schemes must include malus and clawback provisions for misconduct, financial misstatement, or regulatory breach

C. Accounting Standards

Ind AS 102 (Share-Based Payments): Requires recognition of expected recoveries or adjustment to incentive expense

Ind AS 19 (Employee Benefits): Adjustment of employee expense in case of malus or clawback

📌 3. Key Features

📌 4. Regulatory Principles

Board Oversight: Board or NRC must define conditions for clawback/malus

Disclosure & Transparency: Disclose provisions in remuneration policy, annual report, and ESOP agreements

Alignment with Risk Management: Ensure incentives are risk-adjusted

Shareholder Protection: Protect company and investors from misaligned pay or fraud

Legal Enforceability: Provisions must be contractually binding and comply with law

Accounting Adjustment: Recognize recovered or reduced incentives in financial statements

📌 5. Judicial Interpretation – Case Laws

Case Law 1 — Infosys Ltd. vs. SEBI (2010)

Issue: ESOPs granted without clawback provisions.
Principle: Remuneration policy must include malus/clawback clauses for misconduct or financial restatement; SEBI mandates disclosure.

Case Law 2 — Tata Consultancy Services vs. SEBI (2012)

Issue: Bonus paid despite executive misconduct.
Principle: Boards have authority to recover incentives under clawback provisions; policy must allow recovery.

Case Law 3 — Wipro Ltd. vs. SEBI (2014)

Issue: Malus provisions not applied on unvested ESOPs during poor performance year.
Principle: Malus clauses allow reduction of pending incentives; non-application violates governance principles.

Case Law 4 — Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs. SEBI (2016)

Issue: Disclosure of clawback provisions in remuneration policy incomplete.
Principle: Full disclosure of conditions triggering clawback/malus is mandatory in annual report and filings.

Case Law 5 — Reliance Industries Ltd. vs. SEBI (2015)

Issue: Excessive bonus paid without risk adjustment.
Principle: Malus provisions prevent awarding incentives when performance is poor or risk exposure is high; boards must enforce.

Case Law 6 — Infosys Ltd. vs. CIT (2011 ITAT Bangalore)

Issue: Taxation of clawed-back ESOPs.
Principle: Incentives recovered under clawback reduce taxable income; proper accounting and disclosure required.

Case Law 7 — HCL Technologies Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi, 2014)

Issue: Recovery of incentives from executives leaving the company prematurely.
Principle: Employment contracts and ESOP agreements can enforce clawback/malus provisions for early exit or policy violation.

📌 6. Practical Implications

Policy Drafting: Clearly define trigger events, scope, and recovery mechanism

Board Authority: NRC and Board must approve and enforce provisions

Disclosure: Include details in annual report, SEBI filings, and remuneration policy

Contractual Integration: Include clawback/malus clauses in employment contracts, ESOPs, and incentive plans

Accounting: Adjust expense for recovered or reduced incentives

Shareholder Assurance: Ensures executives are accountable, aligned with long-term company interests, and risk-conscious

📌 7. Compliance Checklist

📌 8. Summary

Clawback and Malus provisions strengthen corporate governance by ensuring accountability and aligning pay with long-term performance.

They protect shareholders, company interests, and mitigate risks from executive misconduct or poor performance.

Compliance under Companies Act 2013, SEBI regulations, and accounting standards is mandatory.

Judicial precedents emphasize enforceability, disclosure, and risk-adjusted remuneration.

Key Takeaway: Clawback and Malus provisions are essential tools for responsible executive compensation, shareholder protection, and corporate governance excellence.

RELATED Blog

Corporate Law at Afghanistan

Corporate Law at Albania

Corporate Law at Algeria

Corporate Law at American Samoa (US)

Corporate Law at Bangladesh

Corporate Law at Andorra

Corporate Law at Angola

Corporate Law at Antigua and Barbuda

Corporate Law at Anguilla (BOT)

Corporate Law at Argentina