Board And Shareholder Approval Thresholds
๐ Board and Shareholder Approval Thresholds (India)
Corporate decisions are split between:
Board powers (management authority)
Shareholder powers (ownership control)
Governed by:
Companies Act, 2013
Articles of Association
SEBI LODR (for listed companies)
๐งพ 1. Board Powers โ Section 179
The Board is responsible for day-to-day management. Certain powers must be exercised only by Board Resolution at a meeting:
| Power | Section |
|---|---|
| Borrow money | 179(3)(d) |
| Invest company funds | 179(3)(e) |
| Grant loans/guarantees | 179(3)(f) |
| Approve financial statements | 134 |
| Issue securities (subject to Act) | 179 |
Cannot be passed by circular resolution.
๐ 2. Shareholder Approval โ Ordinary vs Special Resolution
| Type | Voting Requirement |
|---|---|
| Ordinary Resolution | >50% votes |
| Special Resolution | โฅ75% votes |
๐ 3. Matters Requiring Shareholder Approval
(A) Ordinary Resolution
Declaration of dividend
Appointment of directors (in most cases)
Appointment of auditors
(B) Special Resolution
| Matter | Section |
|---|---|
| Alteration of MOA/AOA | 13, 14 |
| Change of name | 13 |
| Issue of further shares (preferential) | 62 |
| Buy-back of shares | 68 |
| Reduction of capital | 66 |
| Borrowing beyond limits | 180(1)(c) |
| Sale of undertaking | 180(1)(a) |
| Loans/guarantees beyond limits | 186 |
| Related Party Transactions (threshold) | 188 |
๐ 4. Section 180 โ Restriction on Board Powers
Board needs special resolution for:
Sale/lease of whole or substantially whole undertaking
Borrowing beyond paid-up capital + free reserves
Remission of debt due from director
๐ 5. Principle Behind the Thresholds
| Board | Shareholders |
|---|---|
| Manage business | Decide fundamental changes |
| Operational control | Ownership protection |
| Quick decisions | Major structural decisions |
โ Key Case Laws
1๏ธโฃ Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate v. Cuninghame (1906)
Shareholders cannot interfere with board decisions unless Articles allow.
๐ Board autonomy principle.
2๏ธโฃ Shaw & Sons v. Shaw (1935)
Board manages company; shareholders cannot override management powers.
๐ Separation of powers doctrine.
3๏ธโฃ Howard Smith Ltd v. Ampol Petroleum (1974 PC)
Board powers must be used for proper purpose.
๐ Even valid board approval can be invalid if purpose improper.
4๏ธโฃ Needle Industries v. Needle Industries Newey (1981 SC)
Majority powers cannot be exercised oppressively.
๐ Shareholder approval must be bona fide.
5๏ธโฃ Nanalal Zaver v. Bombay Life Assurance (1950 SC)
Directors are fiduciaries and must act in interest of company.
๐ Board approvals subject to fiduciary standards.
6๏ธโฃ Dale & Carrington Investment v. P.K. Prathapan (2005 SC)
Corporate machinery cannot be used for personal control.
๐ Shareholder resolutions can be invalid if oppressive.
7๏ธโฃ LIC v. Escorts Ltd (1986 SC)
Courts do not sit in appeal over commercial decisions of board unless illegal.
๐ Judicial deference to corporate approvals.
๐ 6. When Approval Becomes Invalid
Even if formal approval exists, courts may intervene if:
Fraud on minority
Mala fide purpose
Conflict of interest
Violation of statute
Lack of quorum/notice
๐ 7. Governance Safeguards
โ Proper notice & explanatory statement
โ Interested directors abstain
โ Independent director review
โ Recording dissent
๐ฏ Key Takeaway
Corporate law balances efficiency vs accountability:
Board โ operational control
Shareholders โ structural & ownership decisions
Approval thresholds ensure major changes cannot be made without owner consent, while management remains functional.

comments