Board And Shareholder Approval Thresholds

๐Ÿ“Œ Board and Shareholder Approval Thresholds (India)

Corporate decisions are split between:

Board powers (management authority)

Shareholder powers (ownership control)

Governed by:

Companies Act, 2013

Articles of Association

SEBI LODR (for listed companies)

๐Ÿงพ 1. Board Powers โ€“ Section 179

The Board is responsible for day-to-day management. Certain powers must be exercised only by Board Resolution at a meeting:

PowerSection
Borrow money179(3)(d)
Invest company funds179(3)(e)
Grant loans/guarantees179(3)(f)
Approve financial statements134
Issue securities (subject to Act)179

Cannot be passed by circular resolution.

๐Ÿ“Œ 2. Shareholder Approval โ€“ Ordinary vs Special Resolution

TypeVoting Requirement
Ordinary Resolution>50% votes
Special Resolutionโ‰ฅ75% votes

๐Ÿ“Œ 3. Matters Requiring Shareholder Approval

(A) Ordinary Resolution

Declaration of dividend

Appointment of directors (in most cases)

Appointment of auditors

(B) Special Resolution

MatterSection
Alteration of MOA/AOA13, 14
Change of name13
Issue of further shares (preferential)62
Buy-back of shares68
Reduction of capital66
Borrowing beyond limits180(1)(c)
Sale of undertaking180(1)(a)
Loans/guarantees beyond limits186
Related Party Transactions (threshold)188

๐Ÿ“Œ 4. Section 180 โ€” Restriction on Board Powers

Board needs special resolution for:

Sale/lease of whole or substantially whole undertaking

Borrowing beyond paid-up capital + free reserves

Remission of debt due from director

๐Ÿ“Œ 5. Principle Behind the Thresholds

BoardShareholders
Manage businessDecide fundamental changes
Operational controlOwnership protection
Quick decisionsMajor structural decisions

โš– Key Case Laws

1๏ธโƒฃ Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate v. Cuninghame (1906)

Shareholders cannot interfere with board decisions unless Articles allow.
๐Ÿ‘‰ Board autonomy principle.

2๏ธโƒฃ Shaw & Sons v. Shaw (1935)

Board manages company; shareholders cannot override management powers.
๐Ÿ‘‰ Separation of powers doctrine.

3๏ธโƒฃ Howard Smith Ltd v. Ampol Petroleum (1974 PC)

Board powers must be used for proper purpose.
๐Ÿ‘‰ Even valid board approval can be invalid if purpose improper.

4๏ธโƒฃ Needle Industries v. Needle Industries Newey (1981 SC)

Majority powers cannot be exercised oppressively.
๐Ÿ‘‰ Shareholder approval must be bona fide.

5๏ธโƒฃ Nanalal Zaver v. Bombay Life Assurance (1950 SC)

Directors are fiduciaries and must act in interest of company.
๐Ÿ‘‰ Board approvals subject to fiduciary standards.

6๏ธโƒฃ Dale & Carrington Investment v. P.K. Prathapan (2005 SC)

Corporate machinery cannot be used for personal control.
๐Ÿ‘‰ Shareholder resolutions can be invalid if oppressive.

7๏ธโƒฃ LIC v. Escorts Ltd (1986 SC)

Courts do not sit in appeal over commercial decisions of board unless illegal.
๐Ÿ‘‰ Judicial deference to corporate approvals.

๐Ÿ“Œ 6. When Approval Becomes Invalid

Even if formal approval exists, courts may intervene if:

Fraud on minority

Mala fide purpose

Conflict of interest

Violation of statute

Lack of quorum/notice

๐Ÿ“Œ 7. Governance Safeguards

โœ” Proper notice & explanatory statement
โœ” Interested directors abstain
โœ” Independent director review
โœ” Recording dissent

๐ŸŽฏ Key Takeaway

Corporate law balances efficiency vs accountability:

Board โ†’ operational control

Shareholders โ†’ structural & ownership decisions

Approval thresholds ensure major changes cannot be made without owner consent, while management remains functional.

LEAVE A COMMENT