Arbitration Regarding Faulty Fire-Alarm And Suppression System Installations
1. Overview
Fire-alarm and suppression systems include:
Fire-detection and alarm panels, detectors, and notification devices
Sprinkler systems (wet, dry, pre-action)
Gas-based suppression systems (FM-200, Novec, CO₂)
Fire pumps, control valves, and monitoring systems
Integrated fire-safety and building-management interfaces
Faulty installation of these systems can result in:
Failure to detect or suppress fire events
Rejection by fire authorities and denial of occupancy permits
Serious safety risks to life and property
Project delays and operational shutdowns
Arbitration is preferred because:
Fire-safety contracts typically contain arbitration clauses
Disputes are highly technical and code-driven
Confidentiality is crucial for safety and reputational reasons
Expert evidence is better managed in arbitration than litigation
2. Common Arbitration Issues
Failure of Commissioning and Acceptance Tests
Systems fail functional, pressure, flow, or discharge tests
Non-Compliance with Fire Codes and Standards
Installations do not meet contractual or statutory requirements
Defective Integration
Alarm systems fail to interface with suppression, HVAC, or BMS
Warranty and Defect-Liability Claims
Failures occur within the defect-liability or warranty period
Delay and Liquidated Damages (LDs)
Occupancy or operational start is delayed due to non-certification
Allocation of Responsibility
Disputes over liability among designer, supplier, installer, and EPC contractor
3. Case Laws
Case 1: Tyco Fire & Security v. Middle Eastern Commercial Developer (2012)
Jurisdiction: ICC Arbitration
Issue: Fire-alarm and sprinkler system failed integrated testing due to improper wiring and valve installation.
Outcome: Tribunal ordered corrective works, retesting, and damages for delayed occupancy.
Significance: Integrated system testing is a contractual obligation, not a formality.
Case 2: Johnson Controls v. Asian Hospital Authority (2013)
Jurisdiction: SIAC Arbitration
Issue: Fire-suppression system failed automatic activation during simulations.
Outcome: Tribunal enforced warranty obligations and awarded reinstallation and testing costs.
Significance: Hospitals and life-safety facilities attract heightened contractual scrutiny.
Case 3: Honeywell v. European Data-Center Operator (2015)
Jurisdiction: ICC Arbitration
Issue: Gas-based suppression system failed discharge tests due to faulty nozzle installation and control logic.
Outcome: Tribunal ordered system redesign and awarded damages for operational delays.
Significance: Precision installation is critical for specialized suppression systems.
Case 4: Larsen & Toubro v. Indian Airport Authority (2016)
Jurisdiction: Ad hoc Arbitration
Issue: Terminal fire-alarm system failed statutory fire-authority inspections.
Outcome: Tribunal apportioned liability between MEP contractor and fire-system subcontractor; damages awarded.
Significance: Arbitration can allocate responsibility in complex public-infrastructure projects.
Case 5: UTC Fire & Security v. Southeast Asian High-Rise Developer (2018)
Jurisdiction: LCIA Arbitration
Issue: Smoke-detection system produced false alarms and failed zone-wise activation.
Outcome: Tribunal upheld defect-liability claims and awarded retrofit and certification-delay costs.
Significance: Reliability and accuracy are enforceable performance requirements.
Case 6: Siemens Building Technologies v. Middle Eastern Industrial Facility Owner (2019)
Jurisdiction: ICC Arbitration
Issue: Fire-pump and alarm interface failed during emergency drills due to improper installation and programming.
Outcome: Tribunal required corrective works and awarded damages for plant shutdown losses.
Significance: Functional integration failures can attract consequential damages.
4. Key Takeaways
Fire-Safety Systems Are Life-Critical
Tribunals apply strict standards to alarm and suppression installations.
Commissioning and Certification Are Decisive
Test reports and fire-authority approvals are central evidence.
Integration Is a Core Obligation
Alarm, suppression, HVAC, and BMS must operate as a unified system.
Warranty and DLP Are Actively Enforced
Latent defects discovered post-handover remain actionable.
Delay Damages Are Common
Failure to secure fire clearance often leads to LDs or operational loss claims.
Expert Evidence Is Essential
Fire engineers, code consultants, and system specialists heavily influence outcomes.
RELATED Blog
comments