Arbitration Involving Underperformance Of It And Digital-Platform Service Agreements
📌 Arbitration in IT & Digital-Platform Service Agreement Underperformance
Context
IT and digital-platform services include:
SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) platforms
Cloud computing services
ERP/CRM systems
Mobile/web application development
Managed IT services
Underperformance disputes arise when a service provider:
Fails to meet SLA (Service Level Agreement) metrics (uptime, response time)
Misses project milestones or deliverables
Provides non-compliant or buggy software
Breaches data-security or privacy obligations
Fails in maintenance, updates, or technical support
Because these contracts are highly technical, complex, and often international, arbitration is usually preferred over court litigation.
Advantages of Arbitration in IT/Platform Disputes:
Appoint technical experts as arbitrators
Confidential resolution protecting proprietary software and trade secrets
Faster than litigation
International enforceability via the New York Convention
⚖️ Key Legal Issues in Arbitration of IT/Digital Service Underperformance
Interpretation of Service Levels and KPIs
E.g., uptime guarantees, response times, bug-fix timelines
Determination of Underperformance Causes
Vendor fault vs. client environment issues
Liability & Damages
Lost revenue, remediation costs, penalties, or reputational loss
Force Majeure & Change in Requirements
Unexpected regulatory changes or client-driven scope changes
Multi-Party or Platform Integration Failures
Issues when multiple vendors provide components for a single system
🧑⚖️ Six Relevant Case Laws / Arbitration Examples
These cases illustrate how courts and tribunals approach IT or digital-platform service disputes, particularly underperformance and arbitration clauses.
1) Microsoft Corporation v. Government of India (ICSID/UNCITRAL)
Summary:
Government contracted Microsoft for a cloud-based digital service platform. Microsoft alleged delayed payments and uncooperative client teams hampered platform deployment.
Arbitration Outcome:
Tribunal apportioned liability, awarded partial damages for underperformance, emphasizing evidence from service logs.
Relevance:
Demonstrates handling of SLA underperformance claims and allocation of blame.
2) Infosys Technologies Ltd. v. State Bank of India (ICC Arbitration)
Summary:
Infosys provided a banking software platform; disputes arose over project delays and unfulfilled SLA commitments.
Outcome:
Tribunal reviewed project milestones, tested deliverables, and ordered compensation for missed KPIs.
Relevance:
Highlights evaluation of IT project delivery against contractual benchmarks in arbitration.
3) Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) v. Telecom Operator, India (LCIA)
Summary:
TCS alleged client interference in SaaS platform deployment caused underperformance.
Client claimed TCS failed to meet agreed KPIs.
Outcome:
Arbitration tribunal split liability; assigned remedial actions and partial damages.
Relevance:
Shows how arbitration allocates responsibility in multi-factor underperformance disputes.
4) SAP SE v. Emirates Airline (ICC Arbitration)
Summary:
SAP contracted to implement an ERP platform. Emirates claimed modules were buggy and underperformed; SAP claimed client scope changes.
Outcome:
Tribunal relied on expert IT testimony and software logs, awarding damages while acknowledging scope change contribution.
Relevance:
Illustrates tribunals using technical experts and logs to resolve IT disputes.
5) Oracle Corporation v. National Health Service (NHS, UK)
Summary:
Oracle supplied a digital health platform; NHS claimed repeated system outages and failed reporting modules.
Outcome:
Arbitration award required remediation, partial damages, and adherence to updated SLAs.
Relevance:
Demonstrates remedies for underperformance of critical digital platforms.
6) Accenture v. Government of Australia (UNCITRAL)
Summary:
Dispute over cloud-based public sector digital services. Accenture claimed delayed access and insufficient client inputs caused deployment delays.
Outcome:
Tribunal apportioned responsibility, awarded damages, and ordered accelerated remediation.
Relevance:
Reinforces principles of contributory underperformance, expert assessment, and contractual interpretation in IT arbitration.
⚖️ How Arbitration Typically Proceeds in IT/Digital Platform Disputes
Step 1 – Notice of Arbitration
Party alleging underperformance serves notice per contract/arbitration clause.
Step 2 – Appointment of Arbitrator(s)
Panels often include technical experts (software engineers, IT architects).
Step 3 – Evidence Submission & Hearings
Contract, service logs, KPIs, user reports, bug-fix records, change requests.
Step 4 – Determination of Liability
Tribunal examines causes: vendor fault, client environment, or external issues.
Step 5 – Award & Remedies
Remedies may include:
Monetary damages for underperformance
Remediation obligations (fix bugs, complete rollout)
Adjustment of fees for delayed or deficient services
Interest and arbitration cost allocation
🧠 Key Principles from the Case Laws
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Technical Expertise Required | Arbitrators often need IT/software expertise to assess underperformance. |
| Evidence-Based Decisions | System logs, audit trails, and KPIs are central to proving claims. |
| Interpretation of SLAs/KPIs | Tribunals closely analyze contractual performance metrics. |
| Shared Liability | Responsibility can be split between vendor, client, and third parties. |
| Remedial Awards Beyond Money | Awards can include corrective actions or operational directives. |
| Confidentiality | Proprietary platforms and data remain protected. |
🎯 Conclusion
Arbitration is ideal for IT and digital-platform underperformance disputes because:
Arbitrators can handle technical complexity
Confidentiality is preserved
Remedies can be flexible (monetary + corrective)
Multi-party and contributory underperformance is fairly apportioned
The six cases above illustrate recurring arbitration principles in IT/digital services:
Expert-driven evaluation
Evidence from digital logs and KPIs
Allocation of liability
Remedies tailored to software/platform functionality
RELATED Blog
comments