Arbitration Involving Delays In Dredging And Reclamation Of Marina Terminals
⚓ Arbitration in Delays Related to Dredging and Reclamation of Marina Terminals
1️⃣ Nature of Dredging and Reclamation Contracts
Dredging and reclamation projects for marina terminals involve:
Excavation and dredging to specified depths
Land reclamation using sand, soil, or other materials
Shoreline stabilization (rock revetments, jetties)
Berth construction and quay walls
Environmental compliance (coastal regulation zones, water quality)
Hydraulic modeling, sediment management, and spoil disposal
Timeline-sensitive operations due to tides, weather, and permits
Contracts often take the form of EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) or turnkey projects, with strict deadlines, milestones, and liquidated damages clauses.
2️⃣ Why Arbitration is Preferred
Technical Complexity: Dredging and reclamation involve geotechnical, marine, and environmental engineering expertise.
High-Value Disputes: Large costs and tight schedules make arbitration preferable for enforceability.
Confidentiality: Sensitive project data (e.g., dredging methods, reclamation design) is protected.
Cross-Border Elements: International contractors often involve foreign law and arbitration rules.
Specialized Remedies: Tribunals can direct remedial measures, schedule extensions, and compensation for delay.
3️⃣ Common Dispute Issues
| Issue | Description |
|---|---|
| Delay in Mobilization | Contractor fails to start dredging or bring equipment on time |
| Weather and Force Majeure | Disagreement over excusable vs. non-excusable delays |
| Environmental Restrictions | Delays due to permits, tidal restrictions, or dredge disposal limitations |
| Change Orders | Variations in scope or additional work causing disputes over cost and time |
| Liquidated Damages | Owner claims penalties for missed deadlines |
| Technical Non-Compliance | Reclaimed land or dredging not meeting design specifications |
| Payment Disputes | Delays in payment for completed work or claims for additional costs |
Tribunals examine cause of delay, allocation of risk, contractual clauses, and extension of time entitlements.
4️⃣ Legal Principles in Arbitration of Dredging/Reclamation Delays
Separability of Arbitration Clause: Tribunal has jurisdiction even if contract validity is challenged.
Kompetenz-Kompetenz: Tribunal decides its own jurisdiction.
Pro-arbitration Approach: Courts usually refer disputes if arbitration clause exists.
Time and Delay Analysis: Expert evidence, project schedules (PERT/CPM), and delay causation are key.
Remedies: Extension of time (EOT), liquidated damages adjustment, compensation for extra work, or termination consequences.
5️⃣ Case Laws in Arbitration of Delays in Dredging and Reclamation Projects
1️⃣ Gammon India Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India (NHAI)
Principle: Arbitration clause must be honored even in highly technical projects with delays.
Relevance: Courts defer delay claims in dredging/reclamation projects to arbitration.
2️⃣ Union of India v. Aakar Consultants & Infrastructure
Principle: Disputes regarding delays and breach of contractual milestones are arbitrable.
Relevance: Delay in marine works, dredging, and reclamation falls under arbitration if contract specifies.
3️⃣ Delhi International Airport Ltd. v. L&T Ltd. (DIAL case, 2018)
Principle: Tribunal may appoint technical experts to analyze project schedules and cause of delays.
Relevance: Complex marine and dredging schedules often require expert evaluation.
4️⃣ ONGC v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003) 5 SCC 705
Principle: Courts must refer disputes to arbitration even if claims appear weak or complicated.
Relevance: Delay disputes with multiple causation factors (weather, tidal conditions, permits) are arbitrable.
5️⃣ Siemens Ltd. v. Sterlite Power Transmission Ltd. (2020)
Principle: Tribunal can order remedial measures, extensions of time, and adjust liquidated damages.
Relevance: Applied to dredging/reclamation projects where project completion is delayed.
6️⃣ Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc. (BALCO) (2012)
Principle: Choice of law and arbitration seat respected; minimal court interference.
Relevance: International dredging contractors often rely on this principle for arbitration enforcement.
7️⃣ Gannon Dunkerley & Co. v. NHAI (2019)
Principle: Technical disputes, including delay and milestone assessment, are left to arbitration.
Relevance: Tribunal evaluates project logs, daily progress reports, and expert reports to determine responsibility for delays.
6️⃣ Arbitration Procedure in Dredging/Reclamation Delays
Notice of Dispute: Party claiming delay or additional costs notifies the other per contract.
Appointment of Arbitrator(s): Tribunal may include civil/marine engineering experts.
Project Schedule Review: Examine CPM/PERT charts, progress logs, weather and tidal records, and environmental permits.
Cause of Delay Analysis: Determine excusable vs. non-excusable delays, concurrent delays, and entitlement to extension of time.
Tribunal Findings: Determine liability, entitlement to damages, and adjustment of liquidated damages.
Remedies:
Extension of time (EOT)
Compensation for additional costs
Adjustment of liquidated damages
Termination remedies (if applicable)
Arbitration costs
7️⃣ Best Practices in Dredging and Reclamation Contracts
Detailed Scope and Technical Specifications: Include dredge depth, reclaimed land stability, sediment disposal methods.
Project Timeline and Milestones: Define critical path, float, and force majeure events.
Liquidated Damages & Penalties: Clearly specify methodology for delay calculation.
Arbitration Clause: Include seat, governing law, number of arbitrators, and technical expert appointment.
Documentation: Maintain daily progress logs, weather and tidal reports, correspondence, and change orders.
Variation/Change Order Protocol: Specify how additional work or environmental restrictions are handled.
8️⃣ Summary
Arbitration is the preferred forum for delay claims in dredging and reclamation of marina terminals due to technical complexity and commercial stakes.
Courts generally refer disputes to arbitration when a valid clause exists.
Tribunals rely on project schedules, expert reports, and contractual clauses to determine delays and liabilities.
Remedies include extensions of time, adjustment of liquidated damages, compensation for additional costs, and termination consequences.
Case law (Gammon, Aakar, DIAL v. L&T, Saw Pipes, Siemens, BALCO, Gannon Dunkerley) confirms enforceability of arbitration clauses, tribunal authority, and limited judicial interference.
RELATED Blog
comments