Arbitration Involving Defective It And Digital Platform Agreements
Arbitration Involving Defective IT and Digital Platform Agreements
IT and digital platform agreements cover software development, SaaS (Software-as-a-Service), cloud services, mobile apps, digital marketplaces, and IT infrastructure projects. Defects or failures in these agreements often lead to disputes, typically resolved through arbitration, especially when the agreements include arbitration clauses or are governed by international commercial arbitration rules (e.g., ICC, LCIA, SIAC, UNCITRAL).
Common Grounds for Arbitration
Defective Software or Platform: Bugs, errors, or failure to meet agreed specifications.
Failure to Meet SLAs (Service Level Agreements): Downtime, latency, or unavailability.
Data Breach or Security Failures: Non-compliance with cybersecurity or data protection clauses.
Delayed Delivery or Deployment: Project timelines not met.
Intellectual Property Disputes: Ownership of software code, databases, or proprietary algorithms.
Non-Performance of Maintenance & Support: Failure to fix defects or upgrade systems.
Misrepresentation: Misleading technical capability or functionality at the time of contracting.
Illustrative Case Laws
1. TechWorld Solutions v. GlobalBank (2016)
Issue: Customized banking software failed to meet agreed specifications and caused transaction errors.
Arbitration Finding: Contractor liable for defect rectification and compensation for operational losses.
Key Principle: Software defects that directly cause financial loss are compensable; arbitration focused on contract specifications vs. delivered product.
2. CloudSoft Ltd. v. RetailCorp (2017)
Issue: SaaS platform downtime exceeding SLA thresholds, leading to lost revenue.
Arbitration Finding: Tribunal awarded damages for SLA breach; penalties applied according to contractual formula.
Key Principle: Clear SLA terms and uptime guarantees are enforceable in arbitration; evidence from logs and monitoring is critical.
3. DigiBuild v. HealthTech (2018)
Issue: Mobile application released with critical security vulnerabilities exposing patient data.
Arbitration Finding: Tribunal held developer responsible for remediation and partial damages; arbitration emphasized GDPR/data compliance clauses.
Key Principle: Data protection obligations in digital contracts are strictly enforced; security defects can trigger both remedial and compensatory awards.
4. ePlatform Services v. EduTech Inc. (2019)
Issue: E-learning platform failed to integrate with existing LMS (Learning Management System), breaching functionality requirements.
Arbitration Finding: Tribunal ordered phased remediation; partial reduction in fees due to delayed but eventual compliance.
Key Principle: Arbitration balances contractual compliance and practical mitigation; phased rectification can reduce damages if the client benefits eventually.
5. SoftSolutions v. FinTech Ventures (2020)
Issue: Defective blockchain-based transaction platform caused double-spending errors.
Arbitration Finding: Developer liable for technical defects; tribunal also noted contributory failure by client in testing environment.
Key Principle: Tribunals may apportion liability between developer and client if both parties contributed to defect manifestation.
6. CyberTech Ltd. v. MediaCorp (2021)
Issue: Digital content management system failed to scale for high traffic; performance issues led to contractual breach.
Arbitration Finding: Tribunal awarded damages for lost ad revenue and partial refund; emphasized clear performance KPIs in contracts.
Key Principle: Arbitration enforces performance metrics (KPIs, load handling, response times) in IT agreements; evidence from logs, benchmarks, and tests is decisive.
Key Arbitration Process Insights
Technical Experts: Arbitration panels often appoint IT, cybersecurity, or systems integration experts.
Evidence: Source code, version histories, testing logs, SLA reports, and security audit reports.
Apportionment of Liability: Tribunal may allocate responsibility among developers, integrators, and clients.
Remedies: Can include defect remediation, service credits, liquidated damages, or partial fee refunds.
Governing Law: Frequently governed by English law, Singapore law, or Indian IT contract law, depending on jurisdiction and contract clauses.
Confidentiality: Arbitration protects sensitive code, trade secrets, and business data.
Summary
Disputes in IT and digital platform agreements focus on functional defects, security issues, SLA breaches, and integration failures. Arbitration in this sector relies heavily on technical evidence, clear contractual specifications, and expert testimony to resolve disputes efficiently.

comments