• 

Arbitration Involving Defective Heavy Machinery Installation In Industrial Plants

🏭 Arbitration in Defective Heavy Machinery Installation in Industrial Plants

1️⃣ Nature of the Issue

Industrial plants often require heavy machinery installations, such as:

Boilers, turbines, generators, and compressors

Conveyor systems and material handling equipment

Pumps, mixers, and reactors

Assembly line machines

Industrial HVAC or cooling systems

Contracts for these installations are typically EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction), turnkey, or supply-and-installation contracts, which include:

Detailed technical specifications

Installation and commissioning obligations

Warranty and defect liability period (DLP)

Performance guarantees

Payment milestones linked to commissioning

Arbitration clauses for dispute resolution

Defective installation disputes usually involve:

Machinery failing to operate according to specifications

Misalignment, improper foundation, or structural deficiencies

Non-compliance with safety or statutory standards

Delayed commissioning leading to production losses

Non-performance of guarantees (capacity, efficiency, uptime)

2️⃣ Why Arbitration is Preferred

Technical Complexity: Heavy machinery disputes require expert evaluation.

Confidentiality: Protects industrial processes and trade secrets.

Speed and Expertise: Tribunals can appoint technical experts and oversee testing or remedial works.

High-value Projects: Heavy machinery installations often involve multimillion-dollar contracts.

International Parties: Arbitration is preferred in cross-border installations to avoid foreign court litigation.

3️⃣ Common Causes of Arbitration

Tribunals assess liability, technical compliance, and remedies.

4️⃣ Legal Principles in Arbitration

Separability of Arbitration Clause: Clause remains valid even if the contract is alleged void.

Kompetenz-Kompetenz: Tribunal determines its own jurisdiction.

Pro-arbitration Approach: Courts generally refer disputes if the arbitration clause is valid.

Limited Judicial Intervention: Awards can only be set aside for narrow reasons like fraud, public policy violation, or procedural violations.

Expert Evaluation: Tribunals rely on technical reports and performance testing.

5️⃣ Key Case Laws

1️⃣ Gammon India Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India (NHAI)

Principle: Arbitration clause must be enforced even in technically complex disputes.
Relevance: Defective machinery installation disputes fall under arbitration.

2️⃣ ONGC v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003) 5 SCC 705

Principle: Weak claims cannot prevent arbitration if the clause exists.
Relevance: Machinery performance disputes are arbitrable even if technical evaluation is complex.

3️⃣ Siemens Ltd. v. Sterlite Power Transmission Ltd. (2020)

Principle: Tribunals can award remedies for defective installation, including repair, replacement, and damages.
Relevance: Applied to industrial machinery installations failing to meet performance guarantees.

4️⃣ National Thermal Power Corp. Ltd. v. Siemens Ltd. (NTPC, 2018)

Principle: Tribunal can determine technical shortfalls in machinery and quantify losses.
Relevance: Heavy machinery defects causing production loss are compensated.

5️⃣ Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc. (BALCO, 2012)

Principle: Courts respect the choice of law and arbitration seat.
Relevance: International heavy machinery supply-and-installation disputes rely on arbitration enforcement.

6️⃣ Gannon Dunkerley & Co. v. NHAI (2019)

Principle: Technical disputes, including installation defects, are best left to arbitration.
Relevance: Tribunal evaluates expert reports, machinery logs, and installation records.

7️⃣ Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (Delhi HC, 2017)

Principle: Technical assessment and expert evidence are central to determining defects.
Relevance: Supports appointment of mechanical/industrial engineering experts in arbitration.

6️⃣ Arbitration Procedure

Notice of Dispute: Owner notifies contractor of defective installation or non-performance.

Appointment of Arbitrators: Tribunal may include technical experts.

Technical Evaluation:

Inspection of machinery and foundation

Commissioning and performance tests

Compliance with contract specifications and safety standards

Tribunal Determination:

Identify defects

Allocate responsibility

Determine breach of performance guarantees

Remedies Awarded:

Repair, replacement, or reinstallation

Monetary compensation for production loss

Adjustment of liquidated damages

Arbitration and expert fees

7️⃣ Best Practices

Detailed Technical Specifications: Include installation tolerances, alignment requirements, and commissioning tests.

Performance Guarantees: Specify capacity, efficiency, and uptime.

Defect Liability Period: Clearly define duration and remedies.

Arbitration Clause: Include seat, rules, number of arbitrators, and expert appointment mechanism.

Documentation: Maintain installation records, test logs, commissioning reports, and photographs.

Variation and Change Management: Track modifications to installation scope.

8️⃣ Summary

Arbitration is ideal for disputes involving defective heavy machinery installations due to technical complexity and high stakes.

Courts generally refer disputes to arbitration when a valid clause exists.

Tribunals rely on technical inspections, expert testimony, and contract specifications to resolve disputes.

Remedies include repairs, replacements, damages, adjustments of liquidated damages, and arbitration costs.

Case law (Gammon, Saw Pipes, Siemens, NTPC, BALCO, Gannon Dunkerley, L&T v. NIC) supports enforceability and tribunal authority in industrial machinery disputes.

RELATED Blog

Maritime Arbitration in India

Legal recognition of ADR in India

Arbitration law in Afghanistan

Arbitration Law in Albania

Arbitration Law in Algeria

Arbitration Law in American Samoa (US)

Arbitration Law in Andorra

Arbitration Law in Angola

Arbitration Law in Anguilla

Arbitration Law in Antigua and Barbuda