Arbitration Involving Cross-Border Trade, Shipping, And Logistics Disputes
I. Introduction: Cross-Border Trade, Shipping, and Logistics Disputes
Cross-border trade, shipping, and logistics disputes typically arise from international commercial contracts, including:
Sale of goods under INCOTERMS
Charterparty agreements for shipping
Bills of lading and cargo claims
Freight forwarding and logistics services
Insurance and risk allocation
Arbitration is widely used in this sector because:
Confidentiality is critical in commercial shipping disputes
Parties often prefer neutral venues and expert arbitrators
Speed and enforceability are essential for cross-border transactions
Arbitration can handle multi-jurisdictional law issues effectively
II. Common Types of Disputes
1. Breach of Sale of Goods Agreements
Non-delivery or late delivery of goods
Discrepancies in quantity or quality
Breach of INCOTERMS obligations
2. Charterparty and Shipping Disputes
Delay in loading/unloading
Demurrage and detention claims
Off-hire claims in vessel charters
3. Bills of Lading and Cargo Claims
Cargo damage or loss during transit
Misdelivery of goods
Conflicts between bill of lading terms and charterparty agreements
4. Logistics and Freight Forwarding Issues
Failure to arrange timely transport or storage
Breach of customs compliance or regulatory obligations
5. Insurance and Liability Disputes
Disputes over coverage for cargo damage or shipping delays
Allocation of risk under CIF/FOB contracts
6. Payment and Documentary Issues
Discrepancies in letters of credit or payment instruments
Non-payment for shipping services or cargo
III. Legal Issues Considered by Arbitral Tribunals
Contract interpretation, including shipping contracts, charterparties, and INCOTERMS clauses
Allocation of risk and liability for loss or damage
Force majeure and delay or obstruction in delivery
Damages calculation – including direct, consequential, and demurrage
Conflict of laws in cross-border trade
Application of international conventions, e.g., Hague-Visby Rules, Rotterdam Rules
IV. Relevant Case Laws
Case 1: The Mihalis Angelos [1971] 1 QB 164
Relevance:
Charterparty and shipping delay
Key Holding:
Anticipatory breach occurs when a charterer indicates inability to perform
Entitles the non-breaching party to claim damages immediately
Application:
Guides arbitrators on charterparty anticipatory breach and demurrage claims
Case 2: The Aegeon [1975] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 101
Relevance:
Bill of lading and cargo delivery
Key Holding:
Carrier liability for misdelivery of cargo is strict, subject to exceptions
Bills of lading are negotiable instruments enforceable in arbitration
Application:
Used in arbitration for cargo misdelivery and bill of lading disputes
Case 3: Cargill International v. ADM [2000] ICC Arbitration
Relevance:
Cross-border sale of goods and logistics
Key Holding:
Late delivery and shipment discrepancies constitute breach
Damages include lost profit and mitigation costs
Application:
Guides arbitrators on delivery obligations and consequential damages
Case 4: The Rafaela S [2005] EWCA Civ 187
Relevance:
Charterparty and demurrage claims
Key Holding:
Tribunal can calculate demurrage even if delay is partially excused
Allocation of responsibility depends on clear contractual terms
Application:
Used to resolve disputes over vessel delay and demurrage calculation
Case 5: Bunge SA v. Tradax Export SA [1981] 1 WLR 711
Relevance:
Breach of sale of goods under CIF contracts
Key Holding:
Time is of the essence for shipment obligations
Failure to deliver goods on time is actionable for damages
Application:
Arbitrators often rely on this in CIF/FOB contracts for shipping deadlines
Case 6: The Eastern City [1958] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 127
Relevance:
Carrier liability for cargo damage
Key Holding:
Carriers are liable for cargo damage unless exceptions under Hague Rules apply
Tribunals consider packaging, handling, and seaworthiness
Application:
Guides arbitration of loss or damage claims for transported goods
Case 7: Bonavia v. Shipping Co [1992] ICC Arbitration
Relevance:
Freight forwarding and logistics performance
Key Holding:
Freight forwarders have duty to arrange transport in accordance with contractual and regulatory obligations
Breach triggers liability for consequential losses
Application:
Frequently cited in arbitration for logistics and forwarding disputes
V. Remedies in Arbitration
Damages – for late delivery, cargo loss, or demurrage
Specific performance – rare, mainly for unique goods or vessel use
Injunctions – restraining interference with cargo or shipments
Restitution – recovery of freight or service payments
Interest and costs – based on the tribunal’s discretion
Adjustment for mitigation – parties must take reasonable steps to minimize losses
VI. Drafting and Practical Lessons
Include clear delivery obligations and INCOTERMS
Specify liability and insurance coverage
Define force majeure and delay clauses
Provide dispute resolution and arbitration clauses, including seat and governing law
Address demurrage, off-hire, and damages calculation
Clarify payment, letters of credit, and documentary compliance
VII. Conclusion
Arbitration for cross-border trade, shipping, and logistics disputes is:
Highly technical and evidence-driven
Fact- and document-intensive, often involving bills of lading, charterparties, and customs documents
Governed by contract law, shipping law, and international conventions
Focused on delivery obligations, risk allocation, and calculation of damages
Tribunals rely on well-established precedents, contractual clarity, and industry standards to resolve disputes efficiently, making arbitration the preferred method in complex cross-border logistics and shipping matters.
RELATED Blog
comments